Article View: net.micro.pc
Article #7518Dos 3.2 question
From: Steve Ulrich
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1986 06:48
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1986 06:48
11 lines
1077 bytes
1077 bytes
In this newsgroup I have seen DOS 3.2 flamed quite a bit, but since I haven't until now been running DOS 3.2 I haven't paid too much attention. My goof. Could someone out there summarize the known problems with 3.2 and either post them or mail directly to me? If enough response is generated, I'll gladly post a summary to the net. Thanks in advance... Steve Ulrich (working for, but in no way representing) Tektronix Communications Division ...tektronix!videovax!steveu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1882@videovax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!sri-spam!parcvax!hplabs!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!tekfdi!videovax!steveuShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!sri-spam!parcvax!hplabs!tektronix!tekcrl!vice!tekfdi!videovax!steveu From: steveu@videovax.UUCP (Steve Ulrich) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Dos 3.2 question Message-ID: <1882@videovax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-Aug-86 02:48:11 EDT Article-I.D.: videovax.1882 Posted: Tue Aug 5 02:48:11 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 7-Aug-86 06:23:47 EDT Reply-To: steveu@videovax.UUCP (Steve Ulrich) Organization: Tektronix, Comm Group, TV R&D Lines: 11 Keywords: dos 3.2 bugs Summary: What are the bugs in 3.2