Re: Kamerman Labs PC/AT -- BLAST

Article View: net.micro.pc

Article #8032

#8032

From: Jim Gillogly
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1986 17:52

12 lines
1102 bytes

Previous messages have blasted Kamerman.  Although those interactions looked
pretty awful, to be fair I should say that my experiences with them have
been fine.  I bought a SuperFlight accelerator card (9.54 MHz 8086, 640K of
fast memory on it) and it works fine.  I needed to have it serviced - some
chip died on the main board - and they serviced and returned it under the
warranty in reasonable (though not wonderful) time.

So they aren't all bad...
-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	{decvax, sdcrdcf}!randvax!jim
	jim@rand-unix.arpa

Technical Details

Message-ID: <549@randvax.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!cbmvax!bpa!burdvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!jim

References: <1278@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <301@wanginst.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!cbmvax!bpa!burdvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!jim
From: jim@randvax.UUCP (Jim Gillogly)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.legal
Subject: Re: Kamerman Labs PC/AT -- BLAST
Message-ID: <549@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Sep-86 13:52:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.549
Posted: Wed Sep 24 13:52:48 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Sep-86 20:57:48 EDT
References: <1278@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <301@wanginst.UUCP>
Organization: Banzai Institute
Lines: 12
Keywords: Kamerman SuperFlight card works well

Reply to Parent Message