Re: Lattice C Rev. 3.00H malloc() Bug

Article View: net.micro.pc

Article #8348

#8348

From: roper
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1986 16:05

15 lines
1278 bytes

In article <160@itcatl.UUCP> parris@itcatl.UUCP (Parris Hughes) writes:
>(long discussion of problem with Lattice and Lattice Tech Support)
>
>Does anyone out there have any idea of how difficult it is to port a fairly
>sizable system (including assembler interfaces) from Lattice C to MicroSoft C?
>
Having recently gone through a similar problem with Lattice (now resolved --
they gave me source which I patched myself), I can understand your frustration.

My only question is:  what makes you think Microsoft will give you better
support?  (Serious question -- I've heard nothing but bad things about trying
to get support from them...but it's all second-hand at best.)

-- 
Bill Roper, ihnp4!chinet!roper

Technical Details

Message-ID: <638@chinet.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!roper

References: <160@itcatl.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!roper
From: roper@chinet.UUCP (roper)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: Lattice C Rev. 3.00H malloc() Bug
Message-ID: <638@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Oct-86 12:05:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: chinet.638
Posted: Fri Oct 17 12:05:34 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Oct-86 23:05:49 EDT
References: <160@itcatl.UUCP>
Reply-To: roper@chinet.UUCP (Bill Roper-)
Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message