Article View: net.micro.pc
Article #6888Re: How Good is the AT&T 6300 Plus?
From: Joseph D. Shapiro
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1986 17:46
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1986 17:46
27 lines
1596 bytes
1596 bytes
In article <9885@ucsfcgl.ucsfcgl.UUCP> russack@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Joe Russack%CGL) writes: > > The pc compatibility is not too good. It is passing, (and much > better than unmentionable clones) but not as good as some > others (like the ITT, compaq,etc). > >Joseph Russack > >!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!russack point of interest, the 6300 (although i'm not possitive about the plus) is made by Olivetti for AT&T. The comperable ITT machine is also made by Olivetti. Olivetti sells it themselves as the M24. All three machines are identical except for paint and such. None of this is secret, you can gather as much from the trade journals, but how can the ATT differ from the ITT in that respect? Must be a case of perspective. -- -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Joseph D. Shapiro "He who hesitates Bunker Ramo Information Systems is lunch" ...ittatc!bunker!shap ...decvax!bunker!shap
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1198@bunker.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittatc!bunker!shapReferences:
<1927@osu-eddie.UUCP> <350@omen.UUCP> <1286@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <9885@ucsfcgl.ucsfcgl.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittatc!bunker!shap From: shap@bunker.UUCP (Joseph D. Shapiro) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.unix Subject: Re: How Good is the AT&T 6300 Plus? Message-ID: <1198@bunker.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Jun-86 13:46:29 EDT Article-I.D.: bunker.1198 Posted: Tue Jun 17 13:46:29 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Jun-86 07:50:32 EDT References: <1927@osu-eddie.UUCP> <350@omen.UUCP> <1286@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <9885@ucsfcgl.ucsfcgl.UUCP> Reply-To: shap@bunker.UUCP (Joseph D. Shapiro) Organization: Bunker Ramo, Trumbull Ct Lines: 27