🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <10603@ucbvax.ARPA> tedrick@ucbernie.UUCP (Tom Tedrick) writes:

> I am not sure it is time for net.misc.coke to disappear.
> I think the Coca-Cola company has pulled a fast one with
> the so-called "Classic Coke". I am certain it is not the
> same as old coke. I guess the good old days are really
> and truly gone, sacrificed on the altar of short sighted
> capitalist greed by the large corporations ...
>
> (this comes from a hard core "old coke" addict of many years,
> now drinking excessive amounts of coffee ...)
>
> ps- Are there any protests against classic coke going on?


Give net.misc.coke some time.  Things are starting to flame up
again.

     PROTESTS?!? How 'bout the FULL PAGE ad in the L.A. Times? From the
National "Real" Sugar People? It was a while ago, but the jist of
the article was on the order: "In 19xx, Coca-Cola used real sugar.
How can they bring back "Classic Coke" without pure sugar?"
Something like that. It went on to expound the virtues of cane
sugar, etc.

     There are also smaller protests, on the order of individuals... 
Do you walk by "New Coke" without thinking something negative?  That's
the kind of protest that works.  Negative thought has never sold
anything.

     Does Coke have a VAX on the net? Hmm.. I have a little shell
script that could do some damage...

					  -Jim Hayes
					   UCSD EECS DEPARTMENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Thank God for Mrs. Olsen... Coffee has never looked better."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
{ucbvax, ihnp4, decvax, scgvaxd}!sdcsvax!sdcc13!09876955