Article View: net.poems
Article #1035Responses to "No Choice"
From: Alex Sherstinsky
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1986 03:30
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1986 03:30
20 lines
1444 bytes
1444 bytes
Dear Mr. Bing: I was pleased to see a reply to my poem "No Choice" coming from the net. Yet, with all due respect for the reader and a genuine interest in criticism, I found your remarks, such as "[a line] deleted for the sake of sanity" and "is this guy for real", not constructive at all. I almost resent the way you dispose of the work that took me two weeks of composing and many years of observation. I would rather appreciate a reply containing an earnest discussion of content with helpful suggestions for the improvement of style. Sincerely, Alex Sherstinsky P. S.: I posted this reply to the net because the mail kept bouncing back when I tried to use the mail's "R" command. Any flames caused by the presence of this article on the net are not intentional.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14570@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!oz.Berkeley.EDU!shersShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!oz.Berkeley.EDU!shers From: shers@oz.Berkeley.EDU (Alex Sherstinsky) Newsgroups: net.poems Subject: Responses to "No Choice" Message-ID: <14570@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Tue, 24-Jun-86 23:30:06 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.14570 Posted: Tue Jun 24 23:30:06 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 26-Jun-86 04:15:56 EDT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: shers@oz.Berkeley.EDU (Alex Sherstinsky) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 20