🚀 go-pugleaf

  
"E"-comments from the experts
"C"-comments from the contestants
"R"-comments from me
*******************************************************************
Hand 1:                N    E    S    W    Vul:Both  
                       -    -    -    1NT(1)   Imps
S:A7                   P   3C(2) ?
H:AQT876
D:AQT85                (1)-strong
C:                     (2)-weak

4H...6 experts...6 contestants...10 points
3H...4...........3................9.......
dbl..2...........2................8.......
3NT..2...........0................8.......
4C...1...........0................8.......
pass.0...........1................7.......

*******************************************************************
R:most everyone had the same comments with regard to 3H and 4H calls.
  The 4H bidders felt partner would never raise holding KS or two red
  jacks. I agree. The 3H bidders felt conservatism should be better
  and trusted partner to raise with the right values. I however 
  wouldn't hang partner by raising and punishing an aggressive 3H overcall
  made to get into the auction.

E:dbl. If partner bids 3S, correct to 4H showing powerful two suiter.
  This way we'll get to five diamonds when 4H is wrong.
R:it might work. But I don't trust my partners to figure this out. With my
  luck they'll insist on spades.

E:3NT. Showing a red two suiter.
R:unless I have a suit of my own, thats where I'd let the contract play.
  I like keeping auctions simple and avoiding confusion.

E:4C. Showing a red two suiter.
R:To me, this is a general strong takeout with no interest in playing 3C
  double. Once again I dislike the confusion aspect of this call.