Article View: net.rec.bridge
Article #397Re: Conventions : Intermediate Two-bids
From: Paul L. Hightower
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1985 19:26
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1985 19:26
14 lines
1364 bytes
1364 bytes
I have been using intermediate 2's almost exactly as described by "ttw" , but they still seem to have the following problem: many cold slams are missed despite the strong opening bid. Post-mortems rarely reveal a good solution. We use asking cue-bids and Roman Key-Card Blackwood, which help, but these hands still seem to defy accurate bidding without resort to extreme science. Let me note that such hands are certainly not any easier to bid when opened with one of a suit. They DO insure you don't get passed out when you have game-in-hand, but then so does my mother's method: she opens such hands at the four level! I use I2B's because I prefer constructive methods to nuisance bids such as weak twos, but I'm not sure just how helpful they are. Paul Hightower University of Kentucky
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1328@ukma.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!plhReferences:
<1146@ukma.UUCP>, <23170@lanl.ARPA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ukma.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!plh From: plh@ukma.UUCP (Paul L. Hightower) Newsgroups: net.rec.bridge Subject: Re: Conventions : Intermediate Two-bids Message-ID: <1328@ukma.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Mar-85 14:26:06 EST Article-I.D.: ukma.1328 Posted: Fri Mar 15 14:26:06 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 17-Mar-85 00:02:00 EST References: <1146@ukma.UUCP>, <23170@lanl.ARPA> Organization: Univ. of KY Mathematical Sciences Lines: 14