Article View: net.rec.nude
Article #313Nude photography (scam revealed)
From: plus ca change, plus c'est la me...
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1986 15:21
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1986 15:21
52 lines
3193 bytes
3193 bytes
Bill Dippert of Tektronix writes:
> I love it, I love it.
> As the original poster of the "ad" may I say that..... you
> have all been had! The posting was posted just to see what
> sort of reactions would be obtained.
This has got to be one of the most juvenile postings I've
ever come across. The people who were responding did so
feeling that they were honestly answering someone who had
honestly posted their true feelings. This sort of
deceit has *no* place on the Usenet in general, and in nude.rec in
particular. One of the basic underlying assumptions about
nude.rec and naturalism (in my opinion) is that openness and
honesty are sorely lacking in this world, but that
naturalists, by definition, have a special feeling and
respect for veracity. This is why I never worry about
leaving my belongings on the beach at a nude beach, but keep
a close eye on them at a non-clothing-optional beach.
> Good questions have come up also about what are the feelings
> of persons on a clothes optional beach when someone shows up
> with a camera vs individual rights vs first amendment
> rights, etc.
You're absolutely right, there have been some good questions
about how people feel about cameras, or at a deeper level,
about "peeping toms" coming around a nude beach and getting
their rocks off looking at nude men and women. I think you
might have gotten good responses also by honestly inquiring
about how others feel about this sort of situation.
> ...I suggest that the discussions continue, as
> there obviously are some strong feelings over the subject of
> nude modeling ... I find the contradiction in when
> nudity to be obscene or indecent to be hilarious coming from
> a group of supposedly nudist (naturalists).
And I find the contradiction in your eliciting
people's true attitudes by misleading them offensive. The
people who were flamed at for having no class have
nothing to be ashamed of ... they were honestly expressing
their opinions. You, on the other hand, have a lot to be
ashamed of, by perpetrating this juvenile prank on them,
and the other readers of nude.rec.
Bob Craig
Medical Systems Group
Digital Equip. Corp.
Marlboro, Ma.
decwrl!ozone!craig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<927@decwrl.DEC.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-ozone!craigShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site decwrl.DEC.COM Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-ozone!craig From: craig@ozone.DEC (plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose) Newsgroups: net.rec.nude Subject: Nude photography (scam revealed) Message-ID: <927@decwrl.DEC.COM> Date: Wed, 5-Feb-86 10:21:26 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.927 Posted: Wed Feb 5 10:21:26 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 10:15:40 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 53