🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.rec.nude
Article #355

Re: What's wrong with sex?

#355
From: STella Calvert
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1986 07:45
53 lines
2801 bytes
In article <449@ubvax.UUCP> sxnahm@ubvax.UUCP (Stephen Nahm) writes:
>>I like naking around...
>and elsewhere:
>>I'm not a naturist -- I'm a nake.

>I'm not a grammarian, but it sounds better to say you're a naker than a
>nake.  (The verb, to nake, implies action.  Someone that nakes is a naker.
>A politcally minded naker might be a nakerist.)

Good grief!  Grammar coals in net.rec.nude!  (*Note that I carefully
did not accuse you of _flaming_!  Thanks for the laugh!*)

I found "nake" as a noun in one of L.Neil Smith's books as a racist
insult used by chimpanzee citizens about homosaps.  So while you're
probably more historically correct than I, I'm a nake.

>I don't suppose that *you* personally can be degraded by anything except
>whatever you choose to be degraded by.  It so happens that some people
>choose to feel degraded when they are indirectly (or directly) victimized by
 ------
>sexist actions.  

You are not responsible for the consequences of my choosing to believe
that god is an old woman with a beard; why should other women's
beliefs affect my behavior?  It's another variation on the theme "this
offends me, so you should stop." Accept that argument, and you'll end
up wearing clothes because others find naked flesh offensive!  I find
Jerry Falwell offensive -- does this obligate him to commit suicide?

>I don't suppose I have to justify that porn is a sexist
>activity.

Is porn sexist because men buy more than women do and are therefore
presumably driven by their glands to waste money?  Or what?

>We have laws that protect pornographers. . . . All of our rights would be
>meaningless if they were subject to selective application.

Glad we agree on this most important point!

>pornographers need not apply to net.rec.nude.

We don't have to agree here, thank goodness.

				STella Calvert

		Do what thou wilt -- not just a good idea, 

				it's the law!

Guest on Account:	...!mit-eddie!frog!wjr
Life:			Baltimore!AnnArbor!<LongStrangeTrip>!Taxachusetts
Future:			...	(!L5!TheBelt!InterstellarSpace)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <685@frog.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!think!mit-eddie!cybvax0!frog!wjr
References: <69@ubc-vision.UUCP> <389@tekigm2.UUCP> <609@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <638@frog.UUCP> <449@ubvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site frog.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!think!mit-eddie!cybvax0!frog!wjr
From: wjr@frog.UUCP (STella Calvert)
Newsgroups: net.rec.nude
Subject: Re: What's wrong with sex?
Message-ID: <685@frog.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Mar-86 02:45:47 EST
Article-I.D.: frog.685
Posted: Wed Mar  5 02:45:47 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Mar-86 08:33:57 EST
References: <69@ubc-vision.UUCP> <389@tekigm2.UUCP> <609@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <638@frog.UUCP> <449@ubvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: wjr@frog.UUCP (STella Calvert)
Organization: The Church of the Holy Starship
Lines: 52