🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.rec
Article #134

Re: RC modes

#134
From: Scott Wiesner
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 1984 20:59
35 lines
2512 bytes
> ... [I] have a preference for mode I as what little flying  I did 
> ten years ago was of that variety. It seems quite a bit more natural to
> me when it came to coordinating turns and the like. ...

I know exactly how you feel.  I flew about 10 years ago for a couple of 
summers, and learned an even more obscure "mode".  We called it reverse
mode one.  Left stick was throttle/aileron, and right stick was rudder/
elevator.  The argument for the seperation was not too great.  Seems the
"best" flier in the club (the one who taught everyone else) started out
with a powered glider and a four channel radio.  Of course the glider was
rudder/elevator control, and when he looked at the diagram that explained
how the controls were set up, he put his rudder on the left stick.  Later
when he graduated to a 4 channel powered plane, he realized he'd have to
put his turning control, the ailerons on the left stick, and that's how
we all ended up with reverse mode one.  

I just got restarted in RC a few months ago, and was concerned that old
habits would creep in as I was trying to learn mode 2.  I only ran into
a problem once.  I was flying along, straight and level, and decided to 
do a roll.  The plane did this VERY strange maneuver, which scared the
!*&% out of me.  (I was lower than I should have been to start out with).
I managed to recover, thought about it as I was trying to relax, and finally
realized I'd reverted to old instincts for a moment, and had managed to 
do a RUDDER roll.  My plane does not do graceful rudder rolls.

Anyway, I still think separating ailerons and elevator makes a lot of sense,
and if I get up the nerve, I'll give it a try.  The drawback is that
I'll be "incompatible" with the rest of the world. 

(We need to figure out whether net.rec is more appropriate than net.ham-radio
for these discussions until we get our own group.)
-- 

Scott Wiesner
{allegra, ucbvax, cornell}!nbires!scott
Technical Details
Message-ID: <932@opus.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!amd!fortune!hpda!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!scott
References: <287@haddock.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site opus.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!amd!fortune!hpda!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!scott
From: scott@opus.UUCP (Scott Wiesner)
Newsgroups: net.rec,net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: RC modes
Message-ID: <932@opus.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 5-Nov-84 15:59:18 EST
Article-I.D.: opus.932
Posted: Mon Nov  5 15:59:18 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Nov-84 00:54:57 EST
References: <287@haddock.UUCP>
Organization: NBI,Inc, Boulder CO
Lines: 35