Article View: net.rec
Article #4Re: climbing classifications
From: Eugene Miya
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1985 20:19
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1985 20:19
42 lines
2641 bytes
2641 bytes
> 1 -- A hike, generally no use of hands or ropes necessary.
> 2 -- Hike, may require some use of hands and feet to retain
Think trailless.
> 3 -- Climbing, requiring use of hands and feet (steeper than a 2, I
Alternate word used is 'scrambling'.
> suppose). May require a rope.
No 'May' this becomes 4th class.
>
> The class labelled '5' includes, I believe, climbs where a 'top rope'
> is used (i.e. the rope is fastened at the TOP of the climb while
> the climber is on the rock),
Top rope climbs are not generally rated. To quote a friend
from England, there is a big difference at the pointed end of
the stick. Actually, there is a double standard here since
ratings should be "objective." But for the most part, topping
is not rated.
>
> Jon 'Big J' Alexander, U. of Toronto Comp. Serv.
I also forgot to mention, there is a system for rating bouldering
problems developed by John Gill, a Colorado State mathematician who
is generally acknowledged as the premier boulder. His system is
relative and goes B1, B2, B3. B1 is about 5.10 and above. B2 are
problems "significantly harder than B1." B3 problems should be problem
which are infrequently ascended and which with any frequency become
B2 problems.
Regarding your comment about shoes. If you are just beginning, developing
you skills in balance, finger tip strength, and technical skill are more
important than equipment. Face it, in this age of specialization, no
single piece of footwear will cover all. Fire's are very popular now.
I still have two pairs of EBs. Neither is good for just plan walking.
I walk to the base of climbs in my Roos or my Addais (purchase at a fire
sale) where I put on ice boots, or EBs, or sometimes just climb in
tennis shoes. Some tennis shoes clearly slip off holds. Nikes were
real popular in the Valley for a while. Try different things out.
From the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
--eugene miya
NASA Ames Research Center
{hplabs,ihnp4,dual,hao,decwrl,allegra}!ames!aurora!eugene
emiya@ames-vmsb
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1191@ames.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!ames!eugeneReferences:
<894@utcs.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ames.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!ames!eugene From: eugene@ames.UUCP (Eugene Miya) Newsgroups: net.rec Subject: Re: climbing classifications Message-ID: <1191@ames.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 16:19:50 EDT Article-I.D.: ames.1191 Posted: Thu Oct 10 16:19:50 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 21:42:04 EDT References: <894@utcs.uucp> Distribution: net Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 42