🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by David P. Miller Tue, 28 Jan 1986 17:47
Brazil '85.
#544
Author: David P. Miller
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1986 17:47
42 lines
2791 bytes
Keywords: 

In article <1091@abnji.UUCP>,nyssa@abnji.UUCP (nyssa of traken) writes:

> ...Brazil has been experimenting with different combinations in many
> friendlies. Their old goal punch seems to be gone, and their defense is
> subject to lax moments. By the same token, they were never out of any 
> match.

In article <293@uw-june>,ewan@uw-june (Ewan Tempero) writes:

> Their defense has always been their weakness. They spend too much time
> playing good/great to watch/attacking/adventurous soccer at the other end.
> Better than the stodgy stuff we see from W. Germany ! ..... I,m a little
> surprized to see the 0 scores they had - they are normally high scorers.

Actually, I,ve never seen a Brazilian team that had any defense to speak of,
with the exception of the 1970 World Cup team of course. Brazil is notorious
for not having good goalies (Waldir Pereira proves me right !!) instead they
concentrate in a very strong and articulate mid-field and right wing attackers.
The fact that they been experimenting with different combinations comes as no
surprise since almost every team that qualified for Mexico 86 went through
such a phase. What accentuated Brazil's case was their inability to pick a
coach during the "friendlies" phase. First was Jair Pereira, then Tele^ Santana,
then there was talk of Zagalo again, finally they settled with Tele^.
Another contributing factor to their lost of zing has been the injuries suffered
by some key players (Socrates, Zico, and Falcao~), and the failure to get a
team concentrated and trained together as a team.
All the above circustances have been apparently solved by now, ,and what we 
should look for now is how the team will perform in its upcomming tour through
Europe, this March. How well they do, or do not, perform should indicate how
much work is still left to be done.

					      BIG DAVE.


-- 

David P. Miller - Loral Instrumentation.           /    USUAL   \  
sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!loral!miller                   \ DISCLAIMER / 
********************************************************************************
"Sticks and stones may hurt my bones but words ......................."
Re: Brazil '85.
#545
Author: lor
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1986 01:16
25 lines
1741 bytes
In article <1011@loral.UUCP> miller@loral.UUCP (David P. Miller) writes:
>Actually, I,ve never seen a Brazilian team that had any defense to speak of,
>with the exception of the 1970 World Cup team of course. Brazil is notorious
>for not having good goalies (Waldir Pereira proves me right !!) instead they
>concentrate in a very strong and articulate mid-field and right wing attackers.

	I think you made a mistake here. Their 1970 goalkeeper was
Felix (spelling?), one of the worst in that world cup.
On the other hand, from 1974-78, they had a great one, Leao, who
may challenge Gilmar as the best ever in Brazil. As a matter
of fact, the 74 & 78 teams (with Luis Peirera, Fransico Marinho and
Leao) were critized for playing boring football: great defense, 
mediocre offense. 

	I wonder howcome Brazil's offense and defense has to
struggle one time or another. Since the 60's, they are never able to
develop a team like the 1974 Holland or the 1972 West Germany: great
defense AND great offense.


-- 
					Eddy Lor
					...!(ihnp4,ucbvax)!ucla-cs!lor
					lor@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU
					Computer Science Department, UCLA
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads