Article View: net.suicide
Article #67Re: Suicide
From: Simson Garfinkel
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1985 18:21
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1985 18:21
16 lines
1486 bytes
1486 bytes
In article <393@cad.cs.cmu.edu>, mjc@cad.cs.cmu.edu (Monica Cellio) writes: > I may be totally wrong on this, but I get the impression that there are two > types of suicide attempters: those who've thought it out (and developed > reasons that are in their minds rational) who almost never fail, and the > majority, who haven't thought it out much and are trying more to get > attention (I'm not trying to speak in a derogatory way here) and who don't > intend to actually kill themselves. > This distinction makes a good deal of sense to me. It also explains why something that is so incredibly easy to do (namely, killing oneself), is so often botched by people who try to do it -- they didn't really want to kill themselves in the first place, they just wanted attention. So why do people say that it takes more courage to keep on living and that killing onesself is the easy way out?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<52@mit-amt.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-amt!simsongReferences:
<393@cad.cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site mit-amt.MIT.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-amt!simsong From: simsong@mit-amt.MIT.EDU (Simson Garfinkel) Newsgroups: net.suicide Subject: Re: Suicide Message-ID: <52@mit-amt.MIT.EDU> Date: Mon, 9-Dec-85 13:21:07 EST Article-I.D.: mit-amt.52 Posted: Mon Dec 9 13:21:07 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Dec-85 03:20:01 EST References: <393@cad.cs.cmu.edu> Organization: MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA Lines: 15