🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.text
Article #1066

Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing

#1066
From: Daniel P Faigin
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1986 00:02
63 lines
3178 bytes
In article <1246@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
>	So my question is: Am I WRONG in advising people to stay with ``vi''
>and not spend money for "word-processing software" in the BUSINESS APPLICATION
>environment?

[Note: My wife asked me to post this. I personally perfer vi and
think it is usable for novices... with the right support]

A few notes -- you asked for it!

I _have taught_ word processing to secretaries several times in
the past, and am currently being scheduled for a MASS-11 "Train
the Trainer" class so that I can teach our system to several of
our company's (semi-local) groups.  I agree with Paul
Higginbottom

1. vi, Wordstar, EMACS, TECO and the rest of those "programmer
friendly (HAH!)" languages will drive a secretary to _tears_ (or
to quit -- which is bad news if she's a good secretary). Forget
'em in the _business_ world. Anyone who advises teaching vi,
nroff, et al to secretaries should be forced to do the training
themselves.

2. "Word Processing Software" comes in two forms:
  a. IBMs and clones (e.g., IBM 5570, CPT)
  b. That which I can teach running rudiments of to a programmer
     in 5 minutes, and a secretary in less than an hour.

--> Corollary: Stay away from IBMs "word processors"

3. A _good_ word processing package on a stable system is worth
its weight in expensive rare-earth metals.

4. WSIWYG is a _must_. Labelled keycaps (_not_ loss-prone
templates) can help immensely.

5. Remember that word processing applications expand to fill all
available features.

Recommendations:

1. Standalones: NBI (can also be networked to other NBIs, and
through software, to "name your computer")

2. Standard & Multiuser:
    : IBM-PC or clone with SAMNAword, NBI, or MASS-11 software on
      hard disk (w/LAN)

    : MicroVax w/ All In One and MASS-11 software, VT200/VT220
      terminal (up to ~15 users)

    : Larger Vaxen as need arises.

Karen Davis
-- 
UUCP: {akgua allegra ihnp4 hplabs sdcsvax trwrb cbosgd}!sdcrdcf!faigin  
ARPA: sdcrdcf!faigin@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA --or-- sdcrdcf!faigin@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU

W (Daniel): System Development Corporation (-: A Sparroughs Company :-)
            2525 Colorado MD 91-01; Santa Monica CA 90406; (213) 820-4111 x6393
W (Karen) : Amex Systems Incorporated (An Allied Bendix Aerospace Company)
            107 West Carob Street; Compton CA 90220; (213) 604-4500 x4838
H: 8333 Columbus Avenue #17; Sepulveda CA 91343; (818) 892-8555
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3000@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!hplabs!sdcrdcf!faigin
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <966@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!pyramid!hplabs!sdcrdcf!faigin
From: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel P Faigin)
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing
Message-ID: <3000@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Sep-86 20:02:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.3000
Posted: Wed Sep 10 20:02:13 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 21:42:09 EDT
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <966@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Reply-To: faigin@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Daniel P Faigin)
Organization: System Development Corporation R&D, Santa Monica
Lines: 63
Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers