🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.text
Article #1076

Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing

#1076
From: Brian Fenske
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1986 16:47
41 lines
2717 bytes
         > In article <1246@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
> >	On occasion I get asked for my opinion on computer systems for small
> >business applications.  Since 100% of my computer applications are scientific
> >in nature (which is pretty far afield from business applications), I try to
> >avoid giving business applications advice (except to go UNIX :-) ).  
> 
         And in article <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Paul replies:
> Yes, I think you're wrong.  Secretaries don't have time, nor do they usually
> want to learn something like Unix.  They will prefer EVERY TIME something
> which works as similarly as possible to their typewriter.
.......What they want is simplicity, reliability, and the minimum of hassle.
> 
> I personally would suggest getting each person an IBM-PC compatible type of
> machine.  There's a million and one different word processors for it, and
> some are extremely nice to use, definitely with the comuter-illiterate in
> mind.  They ACT like typewriters, but the secretary CAN at his/her pace learn
> to use mail merge, sorts, search/replace, type of features later.
> 
> P.S - remember, even if they get PC's they can still network, share
> hard disks, printers, etc.  True they won't have electronic mail, but I
> personally think Unix has a long way to go before it will really be
> palatable in the normal business environment.  Don't get me wrong though,
> *I* LOVE Unix.
> 

Why make the poor secretaries learn MS-DOS?  A network of Macintoshes 
can provide all of the office needs you mentioned, Paul, and they can 
have electronic mail to boot (InBox from Think Technologies).  My 
secretary was about as computer-illiterate as you can get but she 
picked up her new Mac and was blasting out memos and spreadsheets and 
using Email in a day or two.  

BTW, don't get me wrong either.  I also love Unix.

I have no affiliation with Apple or Think Technologies (and
certainly not with IBM :-))


Brian Fenske                           Boeing Aerospace Company
UUCP: uw-beaver!ssc-vax!brian          Seattle, Washington
Technical Details
Message-ID: <874@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!styx!twg-ap!amdahl!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!brian
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!styx!twg-ap!amdahl!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!brian
From: brian@ssc-vax.UUCP (Brian Fenske)
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing
Message-ID: <874@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Sep-86 12:47:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.874
Posted: Tue Sep  9 12:47:05 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Sep-86 21:11:32 EDT
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 41