Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing

Article View: net.text

Article #1078

#1078

From: Tim Smith
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1986 00:22

18 lines
1422 bytes

In article <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> higgin@cbmvax.UUCP (Paul Higginbottom) writes:
>
>The combination of vi, nroff, troff, etc., and the Unix utilities do provide,
>for those that are computer literate or will take quite a lot of time to
>learn, a great deal of flexibility.
>

When cithep ( Caltech high energy physics ) got a VAX, the secretaries
started learning nroff and troff.  They had ed ( and maybe qed ) instead
of vi.

They became good at these tools as quicky as most of the computer literate
people.  Don't underestimate your secretary.
-- 
I admit it!  I don't believe in Mary Worth!  I Lied!  HaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!

Tim Smith       USENET: sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim   Compuserve: 72257,3706
		Delphi or GEnie: mnementh

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3558@ism780c.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim

References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing
Message-ID: <3558@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Sep-86 20:22:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: ism780c.3558
Posted: Fri Sep 12 20:22:17 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Sep-86 21:15:40 EDT
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 18
Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers

Reply to Parent Message