Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing

Article View: net.text

Article #1084

#1084

From: John P. Nelson
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1986 20:37

6 lines
931 bytes

>Come on, get serious!!!  Your suggesting a 3 secretary law office needs
>a $300,000 system!!!

Have you priced MicroVAXen lately?  I'd say a MicroVax II would suit a 3
secretary law office just fine.  And it's possibly cheaper than three AT's with
hard disks, ethernet, etc.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3182@teddy.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!panda!teddy!jpn

References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <344@fai.UUCP> <575@ih1ap.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!panda!teddy!jpn
From: jpn@teddy.UUCP (John P. Nelson)
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re: Use of ``vi'' for business office word-processing
Message-ID: <3182@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Sep-86 16:37:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: teddy.3182
Posted: Mon Sep 15 16:37:19 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Sep-86 21:59:34 EDT
References: <1246@kitty.UUCP> <709@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <344@fai.UUCP> <575@ih1ap.UUCP>
Reply-To: jpn@teddy.UUCP (John P. Nelson)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 6
Keywords: ``vi'' word-processing non-programmers

Reply to Parent Message