Article View: net.text
Article #1136Re:nroff/tex
From: N38AA401
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1986 01:48
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1986 01:48
15 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
I have used both TROFF on a vax running 4.2 with a XEROX 2700 and TEX on an IBM-AT with an APPLE laserwriter. The TeX implementation is faster (uloaded vax vs. AT), has nicer fonts (this may be the fault of the version of troff I had that was hacked up for the Xerox printer), is better documented (if you can read the TeXbook, which I could with effort), and runs on most computers known to humanity. Troff and nroff only live on UNIX. I'd go with TeX. I used TROFF f or two years before finding the money for my own printer. If I'd known how much better TeX is I'd have taken on a paper route to get my laserwriter sooner. The only disadvantage is that things like tbl and pic are missing in TeX. eqn is built in and far better in TeX. With effort you can run rings around tbl but it takes real work or real help. pic is out of the question unless you want to hack postscript. Good luck.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<210@NCSUVM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!burdvax!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!ncsuvm!n38aa401References:
<421@cci632.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!burdvax!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!ncsuvm!n38aa401 From: N38AA401@NCSUVM.BITNET Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix Subject: Re:nroff/tex Message-ID: <210@NCSUVM> Date: Thu, 2-Oct-86 21:48:36 EDT Article-I.D.: NCSUVM.210 Posted: Thu Oct 2 21:48:36 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 7-Oct-86 19:57:47 EDT References: <421@cci632.UUCP> Lines: 15