🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.text
Article #1136

Re:nroff/tex

#1136
From: N38AA401
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1986 01:48
15 lines
1379 bytes
I have used both TROFF on a vax running 4.2 with a XEROX 2700 and TEX on an
IBM-AT with an APPLE laserwriter. The TeX implementation is faster (uloaded vax

vs. AT), has nicer fonts (this may be the fault of the version of troff I had
that was hacked up for the Xerox printer), is better documented (if you can
read the TeXbook, which I could with effort), and runs on most computers known
to humanity. Troff and nroff only live on UNIX. I'd go with TeX. I used TROFF f
or
two years before finding the money for my own printer. If I'd known how much
better TeX is I'd have taken on a paper route to get my laserwriter sooner.

The only disadvantage is that things like tbl and pic are missing in TeX.
eqn is built in and far better in TeX. With effort you can run rings around
tbl but it takes real work or real help. pic is out of the question unless
you want to hack postscript. Good luck.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <210@NCSUVM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!burdvax!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!ncsuvm!n38aa401
References: <421@cci632.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!cit-vax!elroy!smeagol!usc-oberon!sdcrdcf!burdvax!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!ncsuvm!n38aa401
From: N38AA401@NCSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix
Subject: Re:nroff/tex
Message-ID: <210@NCSUVM>
Date: Thu, 2-Oct-86 21:48:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: NCSUVM.210
Posted: Thu Oct  2 21:48:36 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 7-Oct-86 19:57:47 EDT
References: <421@cci632.UUCP>
Lines: 15