sqrt etc. in TeX

Article View: net.text

Article #157

#157

From: Clayton M. Elwell
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1985 19:05

13 lines
912 bytes

I suspect the reasons why sqrt etc. were not included in TeX are:

	a) Knuth didn't think they were useful to have in a text formatter
	b) TeX is already too big


-- 
				-- Clayton Elwell
				Elwell@Ohio-State.CSNET
				Elwell%Ohio-State@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
				...!cbosgd!osu-eddie!elwell
-----------------
Uncle Sam moves in mysterious ways, his blunders to perform...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1064@osu-eddie.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!elwell

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site osu-eddie.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!elwell
From: elwell@osu-eddie.UUCP (Clayton M. Elwell)
Newsgroups: net.text
Subject: sqrt etc. in TeX
Message-ID: <1064@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Dec-85 14:05:08 EST
Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.1064
Posted: Mon Dec 30 14:05:08 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 2-Jan-86 00:51:18 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Ohio State Univ., CIS Dept., Cols, Oh.
Lines: 13