🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Mary Ehrman Tue, 04 Feb 1986 17:58
AMC - Jeremy/Natalie/Erica
#784
Author: Mary Ehrman
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1986 17:58
18 lines
1231 bytes
This is starting (starting? it's CONTINUING) to be ridiculous!
Jeremy and Erica are FINALLY together.  Not rain, nor sleet, nor
landslide could keep them apart.  However, Natalie is conniving
to tell Erica that Jeremy and she slept together AND that she
(Natalie) is pregnant with Jeremy's child!  She's really carriying
Alex's baby.  How on earth is she planning on making this
believable when she's only "slept" with Jeremy last night?  or
was is 2 nights ago?  Anyway, this whole thing is stupid!  Is
the viewing audience of America so gullible (sp?)?


Mary Ehrman
Citicorp TTI
3100 Ocean Park Blvd. V2
Santa Monica, CA 90405

garfield,lasspvax,linus,cmc12,seismo
!philabs!ttidca!ehrman
Re: AMC - Jeremy/Natalie/Erica
#787
Author: Allen England
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1986 14:02
14 lines
1225 bytes
> This is starting (starting? it's CONTINUING) to be ridiculous!
> Jeremy and Erica are FINALLY together.  Not rain, nor sleet, nor
> landslide could keep them apart.  However, Natalie is conniving
> to tell Erica that Jeremy and she slept together AND that she
> (Natalie) is pregnant with Jeremy's child!  She's really carriying
> Alex's baby.  How on earth is she planning on making this
> believable when she's only "slept" with Jeremy last night?  or
> was is 2 nights ago?  Anyway, this whole thing is stupid!  Is
> the viewing audience of America so gullible (sp?)?

Remember, soap time is vastly different than real time.

Allen England
ihnp4!ihlpl!alle
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads