Re: proposed alternate schedule - (nf) - Article 105 - go-pugleaf

Article View: net.usenix

Article #105

Re: proposed alternate schedule - (nf)

#105

From: mark
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1983 07:28

13 lines
1288 bytes

#R:idis:-21100:hp-kirk:15900002:000:662
hp-kirk!mark    Jun 21 06:42:00 1983

Given the heavy demand on the technical sessions which results in considerable
overbooking or restrictions on attendance, it is possible that the concurrent
sessions were not seen as a problem but rather as a partial solution since
this would  give an opportunity of session attendance to the greatest number
of people (nobody could attend two sessions).  I don't know that I am in
agreement with this but I would like to know if this was indeed the case.
Anybody know?  Is there a better way?
                                        Death Rowe
                                        hp-pcd!hp-cvd!mark
                                        Corvallis, Oregon

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1217@hp-pcd.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-kirk!mark

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hp-kirk!mark
From: mark@hp-kirk.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.usenix
Subject: Re: proposed alternate schedule - (nf)
Message-ID: <1217@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jun-83 03:28:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1217
Posted: Thu Jun 23 03:28:57 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jun-83 00:24:47 EDT
Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR
Lines: 14