🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.usenix
Article #23

Usenix and /usr/group revisited

#23
From: decvaxaps
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1982 18:17
16 lines
907 bytes
I agree with sdcarl!rusty in that I am still not convinced as to the
need of Usenix for /usr/group.  I also agree with cbosg!mark [Horton]
that we will have to wait and see how Boston turns out.  We do have no
choice.

As John Donnelly was trying to point out, that there is much to gain by
having cooperation between the two groups.  Perhaps there should be
representatives from each group that attend the other meetings and sit
on each others board as a "Friend of the Board".

I guess, as I stated back in the beginning, I am unwilling to sit
through less.  John Donnelly has pointed out the times involved in the
Santa Monica conference.  That is certainly the absolute min().

	Armando Stettner
	DEC UEG
Technical Details
Message-ID: <anews.Adecvax.197>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!aps

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!aps
From: decvax!aps
Newsgroups: net.usenix
Subject: Usenix and /usr/group revisited
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1982 18:17:09 +0000
Message-ID: <anews.Adecvax.197>