Article View: net.usenix
Article #36USENIX - /USR/GROUP
From: utzoodecvaxgenradborob
Date: Tue, 25 May 1982 13:05
Date: Tue, 25 May 1982 13:05
19 lines
1072 bytes
1072 bytes
Subject: Usenix vs /usr/group I went to Usenix at Santa Monica. There were enough bad sessions that I would welcome the choice of two sessions. How about a combining of both Usenix, /usr/group, Uniops, etc. into DECUS? Then we wouldn't end up paying so much dues and have to go to 6 conferences a year! /usr/group's last newsletter told me all about System III. Usenix did not. Usenix BOF sessions were very big, because that was the only place you could have a dialog. The general sessions were all give and no take. Usenix is getting to be very one-way. I have volunteered both at Santa Monica, and via mail to assist on Boston Conference. No one has even replied to me. The usenix tape. $300. EGAD. No Directory, No hints as to what's on it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bnews.genradbo.153>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: utzoo!decvax!genradbo!rob Newsgroups: net.usenix Title: USENIX - /USR/GROUP Article-I.D.: genradbo.153 Posted: Tue May 25 13:05:03 1982 Received: Sun May 30 01:01:52 1982 Subject: USENIX - /USR/GROUP Date: Tue, 25 May 1982 13:05:03 +0000 Message-ID: <bnews.genradbo.153>