Article View: net.usenix
Article #383Re: 2.9 and 4.x BOFs
From: Jim Moore
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 1985 04:59
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 1985 04:59
19 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
> > 4.x - Didn't happen. No one from Berkeley came (did anyone tell them?). > After 1/2 hour, one of the attendees mentioned that he had talked with > McKusick earlier, and that he said that 4.3 was ready to release (bug fix > and performance enhancements only), but was tied up in some legal stew > that would probably last into the second quarter (read Summer). Unknown > whether a System V license would be required. > > Lyle McElhaney > -- Why not release 4.2+ with the requirement of a System V license? It is the only kind available from now on, and this might help the standards effort if all commercial UN*X vendors possessed the same sources and source licenses. Jim Moore NBI, Boulder Co. [ucbvax|hao|amd]!nbires!jmoore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1071@opus.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!hao!nbires!opus!jmooreReferences:
<660@denelcor.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site opus.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!hao!nbires!opus!jmoore From: jmoore@opus.UUCP (Jim Moore) Newsgroups: net.usenix Subject: Re: 2.9 and 4.x BOFs Message-ID: <1071@opus.UUCP> Date: Sun, 3-Feb-85 23:59:00 EST Article-I.D.: opus.1071 Posted: Sun Feb 3 23:59:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 6-Feb-85 04:48:28 EST References: <660@denelcor.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: NBI,Inc, Boulder CO Lines: 19