Article View: net.usenix
Article #44Reply to complaints about USENIX accomodations
From: utzoodecvaxwivaxdyer
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1982 22:31
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1982 22:31
46 lines
2474 bytes
2474 bytes
I forwarded the complaints about USENIX arrangements to Suzanne Macnary,
and she replied to the particular individuals who wrote. However, I
think her reply will be of interest to all on net.usenix, so here 'tis:
>From smacnary@BBN-UNIX Mon Jun 21 20:17:37 1982
Via: decvax!ucbvax
Date: 21 Jun 1982 15:17:44 EDT (Monday)
From: Suzanne Macnary <smacnary at BBN-UNIX>
To: decvax!wivax!dyer@Berkeley
Hello,
I am the USENIX Conference Coordinator working in conjunction with Rogal
Boston on the summer UNIX* Users Conference.
In answer to your message, I'd like to let you know some of the reasons that
hotel accomodations have been handled the way they have. There are several.
- The only hotels in the Boston area that were willing to give us a block
of rooms were the Copley Plaza and the Sheraton Boston. This is an
extremely busy time in Boston and we felt it was important to be sure of
confirmed accomodations for conference attendees.
- Room registration in Santa Monica was handled directly by the hotels
through the Chamber of Commerce. The people in charge of that conference
found this situation confusing in terms of too many people handling too
many different things. A lot of people were unsure of how to get a room,
and were disappointed at not being able to stay at Conference headquarters.
It was recommended that we try to limit the number of hotels in Boston, and
also that we try to reserve blocks of rooms in advance, which we did.
- In researching other hotels in the immediate area, I found the prices to
be approximently the same, and some even more expensive. (For example,
the Howard Johnson's 57 costs $80 for a single, $90
for a double). The Hotel Essex, which you mentioned as costing $35 is
a fair distance from the Copley and the Sheraton, which can be viewed as
an inconvienience. It is also in a less desirable area.
I personally have not received many calls about alternative hotels, but am
more than glad to give out a list to anyone who is interested.
Sincerely,
Suzanne MacNary
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bnews.wivax.134>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: utzoo!decvax!wivax!dyer Newsgroups: net.usenix Title: Reply to complaints about USENIX accomodations Article-I.D.: wivax.134 Posted: Tue Jun 22 22:31:49 1982 Received: Sun Jun 27 03:33:00 1982 Subject: Reply to complaints about USENIX accomodations Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1982 22:31:49 +0000 Message-ID: <bnews.wivax.134>