🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct31.171324.21902@irfu.se> bt@irfu.se (Bo Thide') writes:
>
>Here are some benchmark comparisons between the Sun SS10/41 and HP9000/735:
>
>Dhrystone 1.1 (Yes I know 2.1 is better but the vendors use 1.1 so that's
>what we use too to check their numbers):
>
>With registers and optimization, 500000 iterations
>HP9000/735	203252 Dhrystones/sec
>Sun SS10	118577 Dhrystones/sec
>
Wow! Maybe I should not upgrade to 41 since my 10/30 does 161290 !
What C-compiler are you using? Mine is gcc 2.1 (gcc -O). I  have an old
version of sun C so I don't use it very much...

(maybe you used the c-compiler that comes with the system... that doesn't
generate good code.. you should buy the compiler separately)

>Musbus I/O test:
>
>File Size: 250 blocks
>  Write:
>HP9000/735	12500.0 kBytes/s
>Sun SS10         2483.7 kBytes/s
>  Read:
>HP9000/735	25000.0 kBytes/s
>Sun SS10        10869.6 kBytes/s
>  Copy:
>HP9000/735	 7638.9 kBytes/s
>Sun SS10         2016.9 kBytes/s
>

After running byte benchmarks on ss10/30 and hp 720 I don't somehow trust
these results. SS10/30 was able to keep up over 2meg on file copy where as
720 did only 700 kb! The file size 250 blocks makes me a bit suspicious..

How much memory did 735 and 10/41 have? What kind of disks?
(720 had 64 meg, ss10/30 32 meg, disk for ss10/30 was maxtor scsi-2..
I don't remember the type numbers now.., I don't know about disk type
used with 720 in byte benchmark because the result was included with the
source). I actually run the test by myself on 720 but the result was
even worse 300 kb! 

Where did you manage to get 10/41 anyway????

Jussi
-- 
============================================================================
Jussi Eloranta               Internet(/Bitnet):    ! The ultimate trip is
University of Jyvaskyla,     Jussi.Eloranta@jyu.fi !    death.
Finland                      [130.234.0.1]         !  -- Jim Morrison