Article View: netcom.internet
Article #60Re: DOES NETCOM TERMINATE Users Who Use Excessive Online Time?
From: Dave Harman OBC
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 1996 00:00
53 lines
3207 bytes
3207 bytes
In <brettfDx22F2.ECJ@netcom.com> brettf@netcom.com (Brett Frankenberger) writes:
! In article <50b8g0$ig0@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,
! Michael & Michelle Martinez <mdmart@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
! >
! >What would be the point anyway?
! >
! >I mean, I'm not a hacker, but I do that just about anything is
! >possible. I also am the type of person who would be far more
! >intrested in hacking and individual and reading thier email than
! >hacking a corporation, and reading work schedules and shit. This is
! >just my opinion, but a dedicated internet connection is asking for
! >trouble. I realize that an individual isn't worth bragging over, but
! >I'm not out to impress anyone, just to satisfy my own morbid
! >curiosity. So maybe people should think about that before deciding
! >that keeping thier bot in the channel to protect it, in exchange for
! >security, is more important than risking someone else using your
! >channel name.
! >
! >Just a thought, but when I'm not on, I am gone.
!
! What? Are you somehow suggesting that it is easier for me to hack into
! your mailbox when you are online than when you are not. If so, then you
! are wrong. Your mailbox sits on a computer in San Jose and it is
! neither easier nor harder to hack when you are logged on than when you
! are not logged on.
!
! Of course, you may copy some of the mail to your hard disk and then
! remove it from Netcom's system, but, assuming you are not running Unix
! on your dial-in machine, hacking into that is virtually impossible.
! (Yes, theoretically, it is more difficult if you are logged off than if
! you are logged on :), but the risk is so close to zero anyway that
! there is a much, much greater chance that someone would break into your
! house to read your E-Mail.)
Don't be so sure. Vote for comp.cypherpunks and find out why.
--
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
_|__|__|__|__
/--------------\
| |
| 0 0 |--\
| * | |
| \-------/ | |
| \_____/ |__/
\______________/
����ב�� ������
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qutDxA3HH.3zF@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4vp2sb$h5g@mule1.mindspring.com> <32272d38.9766753@news.easyway.net> <32284a74.2747018@news.sirius.com> <50b8g0$ig0@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <brettfDx22F2.ECJ@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-Thread: 12a392,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gid12a392,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-Thread: 113c94,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gid113c94,public X-Google-Thread: f60e6,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidf60e6,public From: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC) Subject: Re: DOES NETCOM TERMINATE Users Who Use Excessive Online Time? Date: 1996/09/05 Message-ID: <qutDxA3HH.3zF@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 178744792 sender: qut@netcom.netcom.com references: <4vp2sb$h5g@mule1.mindspring.com> <32272d38.9766753@news.easyway.net> <32284a74.2747018@news.sirius.com> <50b8g0$ig0@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <brettfDx22F2.ECJ@netcom.com> organization: Order of Berkeley California newsgroups: netcom.internet,alt.internet.services,alt.conspiracy.netcom,ba.internet,netcom.general