Article View: netcom.internet
Article #64Re: DOES NETCOM TERMINATE Users Who Use Excessive Online Time?
From: Michelle
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
57 lines
3106 bytes
3106 bytes
Jonathan M. Bobin <jmbobin@escape.com> wrote in article <Pine.BSI.3.91.960825104326.18836A-100000@escape.com>... > Dear 3133+ DAwn: > > Its impossible to get terminated, they provide unlimited, or > at least advertise unlimited use of your account. If they do > terminate your account, you can take their sorry ass to court. > > --Jonathan > jonathan@dal.net > > On 25 Aug 1996, DAwn G. wrote: > > > > > DAwn Writes----->>> > > > > > > Has anyone been (or know someone who has been) terminated or > > warned by Netcom for using "excessive time" on an "unlimited" > > account? (Or for using a shell account?) > > > > If yes, please e-mail me. Many thanks. > > > > > > -----DAwn McGatney > > mcgatney@access.digex.net Could it be possible that ISPs define "unlimited access" as: 1. An account ALWAYS billed on a flat-rate monthly charge (no per-hour fees), and/or 2. No restrictions as to what times of the day you can connect without being charged extra? I've encountered many ISPs who find that their users are leaving dialup connections active for days and even weeks on end. I personally feel that a dialup connection is not the same as a "dedicated connection" (which most ISPs offer as well). I can understand why ISPs might take action against users who leave their connections active (thanks to ping programs) constantly. Is it fair to the other subscribers who might be trying to dial in? Do certain users have the right to tie up an access number for days and days and should they be able to do this for only $20.00/month? Often, people say that they can never seem to connect to their provider because of excessive "busies." We might consider that this is attributable not always to an insufficient number of dial-in lines, but also to the abuse of dialup connections. Everyone has a right to be on as much as they NEED to be. Is it really necessary though to leave a dialup connection active while away from home while you're not really *doing anything* ? I always thought that is what people needed "dedicated connections" for. Just my two cents, Michelle
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bb92ec$e0fc7840$062080d0@mcsorley.southland.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4vp2sb$h5g@mule1.mindspring.com> <Pine.BSI.3.91.960825104326.18836A-100000@escape.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-Thread: 113c94,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gid113c94,public X-Google-Thread: 12a392,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gid12a392,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-Thread: f60e6,4ca7e45b8cf4315 X-Google-Attributes: gidf60e6,public From: "Michelle" <michelle@southland.net> Subject: Re: DOES NETCOM TERMINATE Users Who Use Excessive Online Time? Date: 1996/08/26 Message-ID: <01bb92ec$e0fc7840$062080d0@mcsorley.southland.net> X-Deja-AN: 176750670 references: <4vp2sb$h5g@mule1.mindspring.com> <Pine.BSI.3.91.960825104326.18836A-100000@escape.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: netcom.internet,alt.internet.services,alt.conspiracy.netcom,ba.internet,netcom.general