🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.GSO.4.02A.9811161516410.22491-100000@user1.teleport.com>,
  Tracy <nimue@merlins.place> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, ISP_Ratings wrote:
> 
> : Tracy <nimue@merlins.place> wrote:
> :  -
> :  -
> :  -Steve Boursy,
> : 
> :   Good morning Tracy.
> 
> Gutten Tag Steve,
> 
> :  -Now... hmmm... let's see... after *I* made a few statements concerning 
> :  -the activities on milw.general... the below post is made today (sunday, 
Nov
> :  -15) concerning me... (it was forwarded to me).
> : 
> :   A few!!  Shit Tracy--correct me if I'm wrong but it's been my impression
> : that you've been in overdrive on this for quite some time including
> : trying to get users plugs pulled by writing their ISPs (over posts you'd
> : rather not see in milw.general).
> 
> Bull.  I don't know where you get your information, but that is a bunch of
> bull.  Only one account was nuked directly due to a complaint of mine, and
> none of it had to do with any posts in milw.general.  The only complaints
> I've sent in to ISPs had to do with emails that I had requested not to
> receive.  It is considered harassment if a user continues to email someone
> after they requested they stop... correct?  Isn't that what you are basing
> your original post concerning cybernanc@aol.com on?
> 
> The only posts that I have commented on... have been when someone had
> forged my accounts using remailers, which I will add... the remailers have
> been very cooperative in dealing with that issue.
> 
> So you are wrong...
> 
> :  -So, let me ask you Steve... who is trying to censor who?
> : 
> :    I think it obvious, in the context of milw.general, that Mr. Greco and
> : company, including yourself, have been working very hard at censoring
> : quite a few people.
> 
> ROFL... I have had no contact with Mr. Greco.  Once again, I don't know
> where you are getting your information from... but at this time I can only
> assume...
> 
> :  -this person (the one who posted the below) has tried to have me censored 
> :  -since May.  IT has tried by forging my account then turning around 
> :  -complaining  to my ISP...
> : 
> :   That would be very wrong--but you don't say who it is or present any
> : evidence so I can't really address it other than to say this IF true it
> : would be very wrong.
> 
> You stated you've been reading milw.general... you also stated (or are you
> assuming) that *I* have been working with Greco concerning milw.general.

He stated that you and Mr. Greco were both working toward censorship.  He didn't
state that you were doing it together.  

> 
> :  -IT keeps coming up with ways of emailing me and won't quit.
> : 
> :   When you ask someone not to send you email and they continue to do
> : so you are being harassed.   Try posting the harassing email along with
> : your original request that they not send you email to 
> : news.admin.net-abuse.email; such things are one of the purposes of
> : that group and their is quite a bit of collective knowledge on such
> : matters.
> 
> ... it's a bit more complicated than that... and Steve... if you really
> have been reading milw.general... than much would be speaking for itself.

I have been reading milw.general, and I don't have a clue what you're talking about.

> 
> And since I'm being heavily punished again for speaking up against the
> true censorship taking place... I will now bow out of this conversation on
> Usenet... if you want to see proof... evidence... etc... as I said...
> email me Steve...
> 
> Tracy


The accusations have all been made by you on usenet and on web pages.  Why not post the proof,
evidence or whatever in the same forums?  It's obvious that your objective is defamation.  You
post whatever you can get away with, hoping that the majority of the people will just take what
you say at face value.  The handful of people who do bother to email you for the "proof", merely
get an explanation which doesn't actually explain anything.  Would that be an accurate analysis?