🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <45ij8a$jpf@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov>,
Dave Hayes <dave@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

>You can't provide a service ("millions of people communicating
>many-to-many"), selectively restrict that service based on some
>arbitrary standard, and still call yourself providing a service.

OK.  So somebody at UT can't call himself providing a service.  Happy
now?

>This is why I keep saying you people don't understand free speech.

Interesting form of free speech you believe in.  Anybody can say
anything he wants, except if he's at UT, he can't say he's providing a
service.  You're right, I don't understand.

>>Perhaps people should use the service they're paying for rather than trying
>>to mooch off other people, then.
>Do you realize just how controlling the "those who have money make the
>rules" paradigm is?

Is it more or less controlling than the "Dave Hayes makes the rules"
paradigm?

(At least this way, since I have some money, I get to make some of the
rules.  Since I'm not Dave Hayes, the other way, I'd get to make none.)

Seth