🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <33eeae$qkf@sparky.sterling.com> kent@sparky.sterling.com (Kent Landfield) writes:
>Those that do will read the appropriate hierarchy discussion group,
>in this case, bionet.general.  No one is discouraging those administrators 
>who *do* care from reading bionet.general and keeping abreast of the
>policies and changes.  news.groups has been an inappropriate group to
>read for admins to keep up with the policy changes of bionet, until
>you initiated this thread.  news.groups is an inappropriate place for,
>IMO, every hierarchy policy change to be discussed.  news.groups is for 
>news.* discussions and bionet.general is the group for bionet.*.  That
>is how it has worked for a very long time...

And before someone points out my slip of the keys... ;-)  What I meant to
say was that news.groups is for big-seven.* discussions and bionet.general 
is the group for bionet.*.

			-Kent+
---
Kent Landfield                        INTERNET: kent_landfield@sterling.com
Sterling Software                     UUCP:     uunet!kent || sparky!kent
Phone: (402) 291-8300                 FAX:     (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.