Re: Landmark English Internet Libel Ruling

Article View: news.admin.misc

Article #637

#637

From: Paul Burridge
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 00:00

15 lines
1259 bytes

In article <cKnA1AAJDDH3EwOD@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk>, Andy (andy@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk) writes:

>Isn't it more correct to say that *during those 10 days* Demon were
>publishing material which Dr Godfrey had asserted to them was libellous
>- no court having ruled it to be so.

It doesn't take a court of law to declare something like the item
in question to be capable of being defamatory. Anyone with a
room-temperature IQ could see it was. 

--

Previous sig abolished under Woolf reforms  >:-<

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1970@thanatos.win-uk.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7dgt4n$f6u$1@nnr<cKnA1AAJDDH3EwOD@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1139f4,3bef05ac7272c5b9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1139f4,public
X-Google-Thread: f6783,b7fbaecc2a00dadf
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6783,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,116848e9373ed6b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public
X-Google-Thread: fad9d,3f32b12ce8da2cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public
From: osiris@thanatos.win-uk.net (Paul Burridge)
Subject: Re: Landmark English Internet Libel Ruling
Date: 1999/04/22
Message-ID: <1970@thanatos.win-uk.net>
X-Deja-AN: 469681748
References: <7dgt4n$f6u$1@nnr<cKnA1AAJDDH3EwOD@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: osiris@thanatos.win-uk.net (Paul Burridge)
Newsgroups: news.admin.misc,uk.politics.censorship,uk.legal,demon.service

Reply to Parent Message