Re: Landmark English Internet Libel Ruling

Article View: news.admin.misc

Article #653

#653

From: Osiris
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 00:00

8 lines
1387 bytes

Andy wrote:

> Isn't it more correct to say that *during those 10 days* Demon were
> publishing material which Dr Godfrey had asserted to them was libellous
> - no court having ruled it to be so.

Eh? Moreland agreed it was in his judgement: "squalid, obscene and 
defamatory of the Plaintiff."

Technical Details

Message-ID: <371DA5C8.2826@virgin.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7dgt4n$f6u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1916@thanatos.win-uk.net> <ant1621201cbXL#k@pharpech.demon.co.uk> <1928@thanatos.win-uk.net> <7fd8h4$6cg@bonkers.taronga.com> <slrn7hkru7.ag.Sherilyn@sidaway.demon.co.uk> <YCKDXCAdxuG3EwXN@swarb.demon.co.uk> <7fflp2$hsq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <cKnA1AAJDDH3EwOD@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fad9d,3f32b12ce8da2cf
X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,116848e9373ed6b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public
X-Google-Thread: f6783,b7fbaecc2a00dadf
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6783,public
X-Google-Thread: 1139f4,3bef05ac7272c5b9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1139f4,public
From: Osiris <orion.osiris@virgin.net>
Subject: Re: Landmark English Internet Libel Ruling
Date: 1999/04/21
Message-ID: <371DA5C8.2826@virgin.net>
X-Deja-AN: 469149887
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7dgt4n$f6u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1916@thanatos.win-uk.net> <ant1621201cbXL#k@pharpech.demon.co.uk> <1928@thanatos.win-uk.net> <7fd8h4$6cg@bonkers.taronga.com> <slrn7hkru7.ag.Sherilyn@sidaway.demon.co.uk> <YCKDXCAdxuG3EwXN@swarb.demon.co.uk> <7fflp2$hsq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <cKnA1AAJDDH3EwOD@kitzbuhel.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service       
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: news.admin.misc,uk.politics.censorship,uk.legal,demon.service

Reply to Parent Message