🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <slrn7hkru7.ag.Sherilyn@sidaway.demon.co.uk>, Sherilyn
<Sherilyn@sidaway.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <7fd8h4$6cg@bonkers.taronga.com>, Peter da Silva wrote:
>>In article <1928@thanatos.win-uk.net>,
>>Paul Burridge <osiris@thanatos.win-uk.net> wrote:
>>>Had Demon done what he reasonably asked of them, they would have
>>>saved *themselves* a lot of trouble. 
>>
>>What he asked of them was not "reasonable", it was a pointless waste
>>of time, since it did nothing to prevent the spread of the objectionable
>>material.
>
>I hate "me toos", but I think at this point it's worth recognising that,
>as a practical matter of limiting propagation of a libel, Doctor Godfrey's
>request of Demon Internet fell far short of a reasonable request.

It was a request to them to cease to participate in its redistribution.
How anyone can get any effective measurement of the result is a
different matter. 

-- 
David Swarbrick, Solicitor, Brighouse, West Yorkshire
Web: http://www.swarb.co.uk.  david@swarb.demon.co.uk Tel: +44(0)1484 722531
Home of the law-index (9200+ case digests).  IT Law and contracts.
The Law Society regulates us in the conduct of investment business