🚀 go-pugleaf

In message <B33965DA96684F19A@cara.demon.co.uk>, Peter Ceresole
<peter@cara.demon.co.uk> writes
>I can see the problems that might arise and the conditions that would have
>to be imposed to avoid abuse of such a facility, but in fact it's available
>now for those that know and have either Turnpike or a telnet program and
>seems to cause little trouble.
>
>It's bringing it into the consciousness (?) of the K3Wl D00D2 that might
>cause trouble. But I suspect that it's workable and it may be one of the
>products of this case being brought. That's one reason why I broadly
>welcome Demon vs Doc. 
>
Let me see if I've got this right.

You believe that, while DvD may cause a lot of problems for the 'Net by
making it possible for troublemakers to intimidate ISPs into cancelling
other people's articles, it is to be broadly welcomed because it will
make the average user more aware of the possibility of issuing third
party cancels, thus causing a lot more problems by encouraging the
troublemakers to do their own cancelling.

Have I understood your meaning?
-- 
Anthony Hilbert      |     Unable to read brain in Drive A.
                           Brain in Drive A is not a system brain.
                           Abort, retry, sleep?