🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <mAVuRwAJXNG3EwgK@reality8.demon.co.uk>, Wolf wrote:
>In article <7fa8jk$58m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, Sherilyn wrote:
...
>>That was prophetic, as it turns out.  I just received an unexpected complaint
>>email from Godfrey arising from one of my postings, in which he alleged that
>>I had defamed him by quoting the Deja News URL of a posting made by an
>>innocent third party.  I'm not willing to provide the pestilential nuisance
>>with another _casus belli_, so I cooperated fully by issuing a cancel and a
>>Deja News nuke request.
>
>Interesting.  I had assumed that Demon would be monitoring any
>discussions on this matter just in case anyone hit on an answer that
>they had not thought of, but I had also assumed that Godfrey would not
>have the resources to cover all of the discussions that may be happening
>round the net.  It seems that I was wrong, or that he has at least some
>supporters who keep him informed of the way things are going.  

There are not many discussions going on around this particular issue at
present, and Deja News makes it a trivial matter for a single person to keep
track of them all.  Demon Internet retains a full time legal staff that has
nothing to do all day except further the interests of Demon Internet in law.
-- 
Sherilyn