🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 26 Dec 1996 21:29:31 -0500, A Concerned Netizen
<anonymous@anonymous.com> posting through dyn000967.belt.digex.net, to
server news2.digex.net wrote:

Hi Rex/DC.* Troll, glad to see that you are back.

Your domain looks vaguely familiar.  Lets take a stroll back into the
archives.

*********************************************************************
Path: feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news2.digex.net!news
-------------------------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: "David B. Nixon" <HelpBringer@DeathsDoor.com>
Newsgroups: md.general,dc.general
Subject: Re: Fire a fully automatic machine gun
Date: 10 Oct 1996 20:19:24 GMT
Organization: Battlestar Gallactica
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <01bbb6e8$3aaffaa0$d3ec7dc7@rex.clark.net.rex.clark.net>
References: <53bmla$a7c@news.abs.net> <325AE4B2.4FC5@hamilton.edu>
<53i4cp$8jo@clarknet.clark.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn000973.belt.digex.net
---------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155

Pat <prb@clark.net> wrote in article
<53i4cp$8jo@clarknet.clark.net>...
> In article <325AE4B2.4FC5@hamilton.edu>,
> Adrian Sinclair  <sinclair@hamilton.edu> wrote:
> >Mike L wrote:
> >> 
> >>   Haven't you ever wondered what it would be like to fire one of those
> >> machine guns, like in the action movies? Well, now you can and I did!
> >> Select fire inc in Glen Burnie, Maryland will let you rent a machine
> >> gun to fire at the target range on site. It costs around $50 and they
> >> provide 80-100 rounds, eye & ear protection, and a paper target. It
> >> was a LOT of fun. Their location is very close to the MVA offfice in
> >> Glen Bernie.
> >
> >You have to wonder about this juxtaposition.
> 
> Sign up with rayful edmunds or the R street crew and they
> will pay you to do this :-(
> 
> 
> 

way to tell those idiots from the city!!!
********************************************************

>For those that have been slandered, bullied, intimidated, and had lies
>told about them in the interests of "full disclosure", "troll hunting",
>"exposing of headerforgering", etc.  The following information is the
>confirmed account information from which David Nixon (Tanya Strasburg)
>is  posting from.
>
>Name:  Antonia F. Strasburg (a/k/a David Nixon)
>Address:  5500 N 36 Street
>	  Arlington, Va. 22207
>	  703-536-7995 	
>	 E-mail: astrasbu@osf1.gmu.edu
>	         astrasb1@osf1.gmu.edu
>	         hellbringer@deathsdoor.com

You missed several other addresses and one of the ones listed is wrong
(non-existent).

Nice try but the reason I listed her e-mail address was covered in my
previous posts and I will no longer discuss it.  You may, of course
find it for yourself, only 400+ messages to read through.  I would
also point out that posting her house address is not a cool thing to
do, but that has never stopped you before, has it?  I at least draw
the line at real world information such as residence and home phone.

>This is the person who has:
>
>- Admitted to forging headers, while "hunting" others down for doing the
>same. 

By mistake, I reposted a message from you (Rex/DC.* Troll) from
DC.General to news.news.admin.net-abuse.misc and I neglect to change
my posting info back before I posted my messages.  I promptly pointed
out my mistake and apologized if this confused the reader, to all
group in which this happened.

>- Tracks down public Usenet servers, and posts through them until they
>are finally shut down.

What are you talking about?  Most are still open, just that they have
closed commercial access.  You are posting from a commercial account,
are you not?  Beside who would you know that the servers are being
closed to public access unless you are notifying them, maybe they are
just shutting you out.  Most administrators of new servers will let
you access their server if you kindly ask to have access.
 
>- Claimed to be paid by others to track people down via the Internet.

Yes, I am occasionally paid to track people down, people that are
being sought after by collection companies, insurance checks, DMV
checks, and residence checks for automotive insurance companies and
anything else that is legal.

>- Has posed or "insinuated" to be associated with agencies or
>universities - to silence and intimidate other posters who have opposed
>him/her.

Never done that but have directly stated that I had a relationship
with the System Administrators at several locations, and stated what
that relationship was.

>- Libeled, and Slandered others unrepentantly on Usenet - thus breaking
>civil laws for which lawsuits are pending.

What lawsuits?  I have yet to be notified that I am being sued, and
make sure you get that name right, David Nixon.  Yes I can be tracked
down and easily found but you won't find anything on the net that I
don't want there.  Real World detective work will reveal that I have
an unlisted phone number, unlisted address, but if you are really
curious, you can go to my high school (the one I have repeatedly
written about and named), and pour through their yearbooks, find my
picture and match it up with my name and address in the back of the
book, plus I have on numerous occasions post as to where my father is
buried.  Simple enough to check, after all it is a national cemetery

>- Has lied relentlessly and publicly about his/her non-existent access
>to ISP records in order to silence dissenters.

Quite simple, have the system administrators at your domain ask the
other domain for that info.  On you own, finger that domain and track
log-ons and log-offs.  Finger news servers and again, track log-ons
and log-offs.

>- Has lied shamelessly, and obviously, and has stated unconfirmed facts
>and personal information regarding others, while under the impression
>that his headerforging and email forwarding absolve him/her of his/her
>responsibility.  This is bolstered by a claim that "other people post
>his messages for him" while also claiming to be an elite hacker.

I am now where close to being what is conceived as an eLiTe hAcKeR,
but by the definition of "hacker" I fit 7 of the eight definitions
given in, God what is that book, oh well too lazy to find it and my
memory fails me.

Personal info.  What personal info are you referring to that is not
publicly found on the Internet or in the real world?  Bear in mind
that I never residential addresses, residential phone numbers, place
of employment (residential addresses), business phone numbers, type of
car driven, or any other personal information that is inappropriate.

As to the email forwarding address, it is far better than having an
anonymous address, is a firewall against Spam(tm), actually provides a
mean for people to send email to me, keeps my private business email
account and business ISP off of Usenet (away from the Spambots), and
is highly disposable and easily changed.  But note that I post with my
name attached to the e-mail field.  Easy to tell when it is me, unlike
Mr. ? here.

>Do not be intimidated.  This is your Usenet.  There is no one entitled
>to police, threaten, harass, or intimidate others from public Internet
>Facilities.

Yes, do not be intimidated.  I never complain to an ISP for anything
less than a major commercial Spam(tm), improperly posting how to
cancel other people's messages, and/or improperly canceling Usenet
messages.  The only Two complaints I have yet to send.  Anything less
I might make a Usenet post about in the hopes that you realize that
you are making a mistake.  I am really thorough and will check your
past history to make sure I am not jumping to a conclusion.  If I find
that there is a pattern then I will make a comment (post) about it.
Yes, I am human and I sometimes make mistakes, but I take full
responsibility for those mistakes, Posting about that message
reposting thing above as an example.  To show a little humility, I
have publicly apologized in cases where I have come to a wrong
conclusion, or had been to abrupt when it really was not appropriate.
A universal rule I follow, "treat other as you wish to be treated."
Quite simple, if you are continually rude to me, you can almost expect
that I might retaliate in kind, no more, no less, but for the most
part I try to be civil and treat people with respect, unless it is
apparent that the method of teaching/learning requires baseness.

>Report further abuse to:    stop-it@gmu.edu   and		
>		            postmaster@netforward.com	

Yes, please do report any of my abuse to Usenet/Internet, and realize
that I too have the same means to report your abuses.
Stop-it@Your.Domain, Abuse@Your Domain and Postmaster@Your.Domain are
the most common addresses to report abuse to, but realize that most
petty complaints might not be addressed and numerous ones from the
same person might be dismissed, and given lee credence to.  I suggest
doing as I do and save it for really abusive people, and make a Usenet
post about minor abuse.  Usenet is a self policing entity, that means
that peer pressure is the motivating reason for people changing their
ways.  If you happen to see numerous posts bolstering the belief that
you wronged then you might change your ways (see "Nosy Knows All" in
alt.law-enforcement and talk.politics.guns).  If you receive a warning
from your ISP, unless they outline what you did wrong (most don't)
then you are just sitting there wondering what you did wrong and who
complained.	


David Nixon

DC - "God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
         the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to
         hide the evidence."

         Don't forget the short version: God grant me the power to
         change the things I cannot accept.

         And the real short version:  F*** it.

On Thu, 26 Dec 1996 21:29:31 -0500, A Concerned Netizen
<anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:

>For those that have been slandered, bullied, intimidated, and had lies
>told about them in the interests of "full disclosure", "troll hunting",
>"exposing of headerforgering", etc.  The following information is the
>confirmed account information from which David Nixon (Tanya Strasburg)
>is  posting from.
>
>Name:  Antonia F. Strasburg (a/k/a David Nixon)

This is an interesting post, but an inaccuracy here needs to be
corrected -- David Nixon isn't "aka" Antonia Strasburg.   She is a
legitimate GMU student;  he is not.  Instead, somehow he got her to
let him use her account at GMU for his net access.   

The significance of this is that he isn't a GMU student, and thus is
stealing the bandwidth resources of a nonprofit institution for the
purposes of semi-anonymously harrassing others.   The use of GMU net
access by non-students is forbidden by GMU regulations, and the last
time he was doing this on a regular basis (through Antonia Strasburg's
account), GMU issued a "cease and desist" order to her, and he stopped
for a while.

His posts are again showing a GMU posting host however, meaning that
either Antonia Strasburg is ignoring this order, or he has found
another GMU student to steal net access through.

Whichever is the case, I'm certain that root@gmu.edu would be very
interested in seeing copies of any messages from him showing a
NNTP-Posting-Host at  gmu.edu.

I'm also certain that he is the person who falsified several posts
that purported to be from me after I left a message critical of
Scientology.  One of the falsified messages implicitly likened the
treatment of Scientologists in Germany to the Holocaust, which is both
utter nonsense and 100% Scientology party line.

Given that he knows how to falsify an entire header, including paths
(what a $m@rT HaCkEr1!1 ) It's a good idea to be very skeptical of the
origin of posts for a while until this situation is dealt with.  One
semi-reliable clue is to look for atrocious spelling and grammar, two
of his hallmarks.

Obviously, he's also not above lying through his teeth, so expect this
post to be met with denials, false accusations, and most likely forged
posts as well.  If anyone has any doubts as to where the facts lie,
see whether or not GMU administrators take you seriously when you show
them posts he's left from their resources.

By the way, although Antonia Strasburg is a putz for letting this guy
use her school account, posting her (or anyone else's) personal
information is out of line.   

It's too bad the immaturity of a single person forces people to waste
so much time on things like this.

Mark wrote:
> =

> On Thu, 26 Dec 1996 21:29:31 -0500, A Concerned Netizen
> <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
> =

> >For those that have been slandered, bullied, intimidated, and had lies=

> >told about them in the interests of "full disclosure", "troll hunting"=
,
> >"exposing of headerforgering", etc.  The following information is the
> >confirmed account information from which David Nixon (Tanya Strasburg)=

> >is  posting from.
> >
> >Name:  Antonia F. Strasburg (a/k/a David Nixon)
> =

> This is an interesting post, but an inaccuracy here needs to be
> corrected -- David Nixon isn't "aka" Antonia Strasburg.   She is a
> legitimate GMU student;  he is not.  Instead, somehow he got her to
> let him use her account at GMU for his net access.
> =

> The significance of this is that he isn't a GMU student, and thus is
> stealing the bandwidth resources of a nonprofit institution for the
> purposes of semi-anonymously harrassing others.   The use of GMU net
> access by non-students is forbidden by GMU regulations, and the last
> time he was doing this on a regular basis (through Antonia Strasburg's
> account), GMU issued a "cease and desist" order to her, and he stopped
> for a while.
> =

> His posts are again showing a GMU posting host however, meaning that
> either Antonia Strasburg is ignoring this order, or he has found
> another GMU student to steal net access through.
> =

> Whichever is the case, I'm certain that root@gmu.edu would be very
> interested in seeing copies of any messages from him showing a
> NNTP-Posting-Host at  gmu.edu.
> =

> I'm also certain that he is the person who falsified several posts
> that purported to be from me after I left a message critical of
> Scientology.  One of the falsified messages implicitly likened the
> treatment of Scientologists in Germany to the Holocaust, which is both
> utter nonsense and 100% Scientology party line.

You are one of the most ridiculous revisionists I have ever in my life
seen, and I have seen _plenty_ of revisionist trolls.

First, insofar as I m aware, in the last year or more there have been
_NO_ posts here in favor of Scientology. None. _I_ posted a 1000-line
post _blasting_ _post_ columnist Cohen's likening of the German pressure
on $cientology to the Holocaust.

You immense troll.


> =

> Given that he knows how to falsify an entire header, including paths
> (what a $m@rT HaCkEr1!1 ) It's a good idea to be very skeptical of the
> origin of posts for a while until this situation is dealt with.  One
> semi-reliable clue is to look for atrocious spelling and grammar, two
> of his hallmarks.

You _can't_ forge the header beyond a certain point, certainly the paths
header can only be forged fully if you're trying to spoof a user at the
same machine. Once the message moves beyond a certain point, onto anothe
rhost, form that point the paths header is completely out of the ocntrol
of the headerforger.  =


> =

> Obviously, he's also not above lying through his teeth, so expect this
> post to be met with denials, false accusations, and most likely forged
> posts as well.  If anyone has any doubts as to where the facts lie,
> see whether or not GMU administrators take you seriously when you show
> them posts he's left from their resources.

So you're going to try to get other people to harass the GMU NNTP-admin
to the point where he bounces the user simply because of all of the
annoyasnces that _you_ provoke with this troll?

> =

> By the way, although Antonia Strasburg is a putz for letting this guy
> use her school account, posting her (or anyone else's) personal
> information is out of line.
> =

> It's too bad the immaturity of a single person forces people to waste
> so much time on things like this.

That's exactly what this troll is designed to do. And I note that
everything you accuse others of as a rule tends to be exactly what
you're doing. Get a goddamned life.


-- =

Be kind to your       | When the going gets weird the weird turn pro.
neighbors even though | http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/
they be transgenic    | Now. chock full of uninteresting links.
chimerae.             |-- Genesis 19:1-13 - Hebrews 13:2 -- =

------ =A9 copr 1996 TJH Internet SP all rights reserved  ------------
                                                     "Sarah Connor?"

On Fri, 27 Dec 1996 16:10:07 GMT, Mark@worldcom.com (Mark) wrote:

Your message has finally made its grand appearance.

>On Thu, 26 Dec 1996 21:29:31 -0500, A Concerned Netizen
><anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
>
>>For those that have been slandered, bullied, intimidated, and had lies
>>told about them in the interests of "full disclosure", "troll hunting",
>>"exposing of headerforgering", etc.  The following information is the
>>confirmed account information from which David Nixon (Tanya Strasburg)
>>is  posting from.
>>
>>Name:  Antonia F. Strasburg (a/k/a David Nixon)
>
>This is an interesting post, but an inaccuracy here needs to be
>corrected -- David Nixon isn't "aka" Antonia Strasburg.   She is a
>legitimate GMU student;  he is not.  Instead, somehow he got her to
>let him use her account at GMU for his net access.   

Any proof of any of that?  Could this be assumption, assertion,
disinformation?  Proof would really help your assertions, assumptions,
and hypothesis.

>The significance of this is that he isn't a GMU student, and thus is
>stealing the bandwidth resources of a nonprofit institution for the
>purposes of semi-anonymously harrassing others.   The use of GMU net
>access by non-students is forbidden by GMU regulations, and the last
>time he was doing this on a regular basis (through Antonia Strasburg's
>account), GMU issued a "cease and desist" order to her, and he stopped
>for a while.

Maybe I am a mean old professor that has nothing better to do.  Maybe
I am a student.  Maybe I work at GMU.  Maybe I work for a company that
is contracted by GMU.  Questions, questions, questions, where are your
answers (with substantiating evidence)?

The fact is that you are only guessing as to the conversations between
the administrators at GMU and myself.  Truly, the only ones who can
accurately portray what was discussed would be those administrators
and myself.

I hope the profound meaning of this is not lost on you, but you have
fallen for a very elaborate trap.  It all starter long before I
started posting with my current e-mail address.  Mrs. Strasburg was
perfect.  She works at GMU in the computer labs and is in close
contact with their system administrators.  Bingo, that means that she
would be able to get and compile a list of people who submit
complaints, and hand that list over to me.  At least she is more
likely to get that list that I, on my own am.  I was very thorough.  I
went through the trouble of establishing a posting history in
dc.biking, blatantly displaying her address before enticing you.
Imagine, all my friends thought that military strategy was a waist,
could be why I am paid the big bucks.  So, thank you for playing, and
deposit a quarter at the tone.

As to GMU's system access policy, non-GMU individuals may use their
systems as long as their actions do not violate system policies of
GMU, and other domains.  Boiled down, that mean that as long as you
are not hacking, phreaking, cracking, shrieking, or and other "ing"
word you are OK.  There is, of course, a policy that states that
educational resources will have priority.  That basically can be
equated to, if I happen to be using a computer in one of the Robinson
Building Computer labs and a GMU student or professor walks in and
there are no more terminals left then I should give up mine if I am
not working in an educational (GMU) capacity.

>His posts are again showing a GMU posting host however, meaning that
>either Antonia Strasburg is ignoring this order, or he has found
>another GMU student to steal net access through.

I do not have to steal net access when my local public library offers
it for free, just because I am thrifty does not equate to wrong doing
on my behalf.  I would also like to add that you are one to talk,
posting how to cancel other people's messages is a major breach of
Usenet protocol.

<<snippers se thread>>

>I'm also certain that he is the person who falsified several posts
>that purported to be from me after I left a message critical of
>Scientology.  One of the falsified messages implicitly likened the
>treatment of Scientologists in Germany to the Holocaust, which is both
>utter nonsense and 100% Scientology party line.

Any proof of that?  Sound familiar?  I also addressed this in two
other messages.  A close look at all the messages purported as coming
from you reveals that they have not been falsified beyond your
insertion of a false name, email address (non existent), organization,
and in some case, wrong date and time.  I also find it interesting
that there are no messages that you have posted previously about the
Co$.  Maybe, just maybe someone there at IDS Online is also using your
false information in their headers.  That would be a hoot.  That
thought brings a smile to my face.  I am tempted to acquire an IDS
Online account just for that purpose, but why waist the money for such
a childish antic.  Wait a minute, Dan has an IDS Online account, maybe
he will become my evil minion.  Klaatu, there is someone we need to
convert to our Hive.  Get the implant ready.

If you would be so kind as to reveal what news group and subject
header of these phantom Co$ messages then I might take you more
seriously, but frankly, this looks like your normal antics.

>Given that he knows how to falsify an entire header, including paths
>(what a $m@rT HaCkEr1!1 ) It's a good idea to be very skeptical of the
>origin of posts for a while until this situation is dealt with.  One
>semi-reliable clue is to look for atrocious spelling and grammar, two
>of his hallmarks.

I like that last line.  Shall we revisit my post about my having LD.
That seemed to be a fun one for your previous incarnation.  Apparently
those messages were lost on you.  Yes, WORLD I have dyslexia, I spell
extremely phonetically.  My saving grace is that I try to run all my
message through a spell checker.  Grammar?  From the looks of your
whole post, I would guess that my grammar is better than yours.

Now to the fun stuff, yes I am $m@rT, that is one of the benefits of
being LD, an above average IQ.  Interesting note: the same test that
qualified me as being LD as qualified me as being placed in the Gifted
& Talented Program, (second grade).  I further qualified for GT in
junior high, which would have made me also available for GT in high
school, but as some of you know, I went to a private boarding school.
That school did not have a GT program or LD assistance, but they did
offer AP classes and I did take several, English was not one of them,
PASCAL was.

As to your assertion that I am a hacker, by the dictionary definition
of hacker I guess I am.  I do know a lot about computers, and I have
specialized in several areas.  There were eight examples given, I fit
seven.  The one that did not fit was the one of the individual that
breaks into system in search of information or for mischievous intent.
On the flip side, I know enough of how to keep those individuals out
of systems I work with.  There is a difference between knowledge used
for good as opposed too bad.

>Obviously, he's also not above lying through his teeth, so expect this
>post to be met with denials, false accusations, and most likely forged
>posts as well.  If anyone has any doubts as to where the facts lie,
>see whether or not GMU administrators take you seriously when you show
>them posts he's left from their resources.

It is also apparent that you have also perpetuated this and other
threads through convagle and obsfication.  I would even go as far as
to stated that this is a retaliation to my formal complaining to your
ISP for posting how to cancel other people's messages.  For every
response there is a motive involved, that must be yours, or a motive
to silence your detractors.
  <<snip see thread>>

>It's too bad the immaturity of a single person forces people to waste
>so much time on things like this.

Yes, why do you do it?


David Nixon

DC - We should be careful to get out of an experience only the wisdom
     that is in it - and stop there;  lest we be like the cat thatsits
     down on a hot stove-lid.  She will never sit down on a hot
     stove-lid again---and that is well;  but also she will never sit
     down on a cold one anymore.    -- Mark Twain