🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1gnbq0INN6d3@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes:
>In article <visser.724483820@convex.convex.com>, visser@convex.com (Lance Visser) writes:
>|> 	He has managed to do a great deal of damage to soc.history
>|> and soc.culture.europe as groups by his postings.  There is nothing
>|> than can be done about it though.
>
>If it's really as bad as you say it is (and, given what I've seen of his
>postings, I have no reason to doubt you), then why hasn't the site from which
>he posts shut off his posting access?
>
>If the site from which he posts is sympathetic to his behavior (unfortunately,
>there are propaganda sites that support such activities) , then why haven't
>their feed sites cut them off?
>
>He's clearly violating both the spirit and letter of the etiquette and posting
>rules found in news.announce.newusers and (by and large) accepted by people. 
>So why does he still have posting access?

Perhaps because he owns the machine he is posting from, and he has a link
with a common-carrier style site which takes his money and forwards his
postings.

That might having something to do with it.

--
Karl Denninger 		Inet:  kdenning@hq.videocart.com
VideOcart Inc.		Voice: (312) 987-5022