🚀 go-pugleaf

In <56120@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> jerry@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Jerry Aguirre) writes:

>In article <gwh.091492.12@lurnix.com> gwh@lurnix.com (George William Herbert) writes:
>>Cosar set up a uucp link from his machine to zuma.UUCP, whoever is
>>actually running it.  A news-only uucp link.  I.e. no mail.
>>[this is a neat trick.]

>We could all ask uunet to put myname/zuma in our feed entries.
>Unfortunately given the "mesh" nature of usenet it would take a lot
>of admins doing that before all the leaks could be plugged.

+>The problem with fanatics is that they think that their point is the
+>most important point in the world and worth breaking any rules to get
+>across.  How would he feel if I walked in uninvited, one of his ethnic
+>discussions, and started ranting on about the proliferation of "alt"
+>groups, commercial postings, INN vs. C news, NNTP vs. NFS, etc?

	You underestimate the sort of behavior this particular fanatic
engages in.  He does not discuss anything with anyone.  If you attempt
discussion with him, the typical response has been one line of insults
followed by another report from his "sources".  



	What is being practiced is the "big lie".  I.e. these people 
post and repost their volumes of propoganda (10-14 messages per day).
They dont respond to questions, errors pointed out or much of anything
else.  They just post the same stuff over and over again.
	I mean he doesn't even have e-mail and is in all probably posting
under a false name.



+>Unfortunately we can not reply by email and replying to the postings is
+>violating the same rules he does by inflicting unrelated discussion on
+>the readers of the non admin groups.  You don't suppose that he actually
+>reads news.admin do you?

	He does at the very least to create his fill-in-the-blanks 
"you are violating by constitutional rights" postings.