🚀 go-pugleaf

jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>This is my response to an email message I received. (name removed to protect
>the guilty). I think it goes to show how childish at least one of the r.m.s
>types is, and how far he will go to torpedo a legitimate voting result just
>because he doesn't like it. 

I hope that you (and others) don't liken the character of the entire argument
based upon one person's viewpoint. You, yourself, have been doing such a good 
job of relatively clean debating so far (albeit the side you are on is 
bogus IMO). 

>> My point
>> will be very direct.  You people are in the wrong, here.  Your reluctance to
>> allow a revote, now that everybody concerned in r.m.s. has been 'really'
>> notified, is reprehensible.  I can think of a lot of better places for DOD
>> to send its RDT&E dollars.  

The problem here is that this person (if they are truly connected with DoD)
can manage to cut off all the military sites from USENET. That's clearly
not for the help and health of USENET. (*NOW* what?)

>I will, however, post this message to news.admin.policy, news.groups, and
>rec.synth, jsut to show how low some folks will stoop to overturn a
>legitimately arrived at result.

Hey...the jury's still out on legitimate.
-- 
Dave Hayes - Network & Communications Engineering - JPL / NASA - Pasadena CA
dave@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov       dave@jato.jpl.nasa.gov         ...usc!elroy!dxh

                If you want to get rid of somebody, 
            just tell them something for their own good.