🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec13.090624.3957@sq.sq.com> msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) writes:
>I realize these are rhetorical questions, but as the poster of the
>proposal in question I'd like to point out that I also posted a
>separate article as a pointer to it, with a Subject line that *did*
>mention the group whose effective renaming was proposed.  So the
>parallel with, uh, a certain earlier situation is imperfect at best.

I disagree.  This is exactly how the system is supposed to
work:  the CFV posting is an official announcement, and
people who read it are welcome to expand on its
implications for the benefit of other readers of the
affected group(s).

In fact, Dave Hayes did notice the CFV he's been
complaining about, but did not post an article to warn
other readers of rec.music.synth that some changes might be
in store.
--

    Chuck Karish          karish@mindcraft.com
    (415) 323-9000 x117   karish@pangea.stanford.edu