🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <visser.724483820@convex.convex.com>, visser@convex.com (Lance Visser) writes:
|> 	He has managed to do a great deal of damage to soc.history
|> and soc.culture.europe as groups by his postings.  There is nothing
|> than can be done about it though.

If it's really as bad as you say it is (and, given what I've seen of his
postings, I have no reason to doubt you), then why hasn't the site from which
he posts shut off his posting access?

If the site from which he posts is sympathetic to his behavior (unfortunately,
there are propaganda sites that support such activities) , then why haven't
their feed sites cut them off?

He's clearly violating both the spirit and letter of the etiquette and posting
rules found in news.announce.newusers and (by and large) accepted by people. 
So why does he still have posting access?

-- 
Jonathan Kamens                                         jik@MIT.Edu
MIT Information Systems/Athena              Moderator, news.answers