Thread View: news.admin.policy
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by EH9174A
Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:46
etiquette
Author: EH9174A
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:46
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:46
9 lines
1063 bytes
1063 bytes
The notorious files that are simultaneously posted in various soc.culture files every day and are from the same source rarely have well documented sources. T he documentation of sources is a requirement for posting and is listed as such in etiquette in the help files. This individual (most know him/her by now) sel dom sites the sources of his avalanche of viewpoints (appearing over 10 or more times per day). No human could possibly type so much! Replies sent to this f ile are always rejected (i.e. sent back). All of the described are violations of netnews etiquette. Who is the etiquette expert and enforcer? Or is there o ne?
Re: etiquette
Author: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:37
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:37
54 lines
3023 bytes
3023 bytes
In article <92365.104636EH9174A@auvm.american.edu> EH9174A@auvm.american.edu writes: >The notorious files that are simultaneously posted in various soc.culture files > every day and are from the same source rarely have well documented sources. T >he documentation of sources is a requirement for posting and is listed as such >in etiquette in the help files. This individual (most know him/her by now) sel >dom sites the sources of his avalanche of viewpoints (appearing over 10 or more > times per day). No human could possibly type so much! Replies sent to this f >ile are always rejected (i.e. sent back). All of the described are violations >of netnews etiquette. Who is the etiquette expert and enforcer? Or is there o >ne? Welcome to Usenet! No. There is no "higher authority" on Usenet. The net is a collective entity consisting of hundreds (thousands?) of individually run sites that have agreed to exchange / pass on messages. Netiquette is just that -- guidelines intended to make life easier on the net. There are no rules, in the sense that rules can be enforced. Anyone with a feed can do damn near anything they think they can get away with. The typical method of "enforcement" is roughly: posted flames complaints to the poster "mail bombs" to the poster complaints to the poster's sysadmin complaints to the poster's site's feed site Mail doesn't seem to get to the poster in these cases. Mail to the sysadmin doesn't seem to be doing much good either. MN.ORG should have a case for disconnecting anatolia's feed, since the MN.ORG computer has been crashed as a result of actions initiated by anatolia's users. Disruption of service should always be good for a disconnect. note: the crash was due to overload from mail-bombs heading *for* anatolia, but clearly in response *to* the mass of postings coming from anatolia. However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection... UUnet may have a harder time justifying it, unless there is a clause in the feed contract stating that they expect their clients to follow the guidelines of the Usenet. If there is such a clause, maybe UUnet can use it as justification for cutting off the connection. Any comments from someone with UUnet? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lazy day, Sunday afternoon. | Like to get your feet up, watch TV. | -Richard Hartman Sunday roast is something good to eat, | hartman@uLogic.COM must be lamb to day 'cause beef was last week! |
Re: etiquette
Author: Charles R. Dennett
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:00
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:00
26 lines
1704 bytes
1704 bytes
In article <797@ulogic.UUCP> hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) writes: > >MN.ORG should have a case for disconnecting anatolia's feed, since >the MN.ORG computer has been crashed as a result of actions >initiated by anatolia's users. Disruption of service should >always be good for a disconnect. note: the crash was due to >overload from mail-bombs heading *for* anatolia, but clearly >in response *to* the mass of postings coming from anatolia. > >However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG >cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection... > >UUnet may have a harder time justifying it, unless there is a >clause in the feed contract stating that they expect their >clients to follow the guidelines of the Usenet. If there is >such a clause, maybe UUnet can use it as justification for >cutting off the connection. > Well, maybe something has happened. It's been two days and nothing from our friend, at least in n.a.p. Shucks, and just when I was going to tell you all about my fantastic turkey dinner we had here in Greece, NY (yup, that the name of the town where I live.) :-) Charlie Dennett -- dennett@kodak.com
Re: etiquette
Author: Sridhar Venkataraman
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:08
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:08
17 lines
1135 bytes
1135 bytes
hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) writes: I am not sure whether it is true that zuma is somewhere in the Eastern timezone and anatolia is in the Central timezone. Atleast that is what the Date header reflects but then it can be forged. )However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG )cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection... Anatolia now gets email for "free" (right?) aside from the domain registration charge. If it has to download email from UUnet it is a toll call. It would be interesting to know what develops if MN.ORG cuts off anatolia. Sridhar. -- Sridhar Venkataraman sridhar@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads