🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: news.admin.policy
4 messages
4 total messages Started by EH9174A Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:46
etiquette
#211
Author: EH9174A
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:46
9 lines
1063 bytes
The notorious files that are simultaneously posted in various soc.culture files
 every day and are from the same source rarely have well documented sources.  T
he documentation of sources is a requirement for posting and is listed as such
in etiquette in the help files.  This individual (most know him/her by now) sel
dom sites the sources of his avalanche of viewpoints (appearing over 10 or more
 times per day).  No human could possibly type so much!  Replies sent to this f
ile are always rejected (i.e. sent back).  All of the described are violations
of netnews etiquette.  Who is the etiquette expert and enforcer?  Or is there o
ne?
Re: etiquette
#226
Author: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:37
54 lines
3023 bytes
In article <92365.104636EH9174A@auvm.american.edu> EH9174A@auvm.american.edu writes:
>The notorious files that are simultaneously posted in various soc.culture files
> every day and are from the same source rarely have well documented sources.  T
>he documentation of sources is a requirement for posting and is listed as such
>in etiquette in the help files.  This individual (most know him/her by now) sel
>dom sites the sources of his avalanche of viewpoints (appearing over 10 or more
> times per day).  No human could possibly type so much!  Replies sent to this f
>ile are always rejected (i.e. sent back).  All of the described are violations
>of netnews etiquette.  Who is the etiquette expert and enforcer?  Or is there o
>ne?

Welcome to Usenet!

No. There is no "higher authority" on Usenet.  The net is a collective
entity consisting of hundreds (thousands?) of individually run sites
that have agreed to exchange / pass on messages.   Netiquette is just
that -- guidelines intended to make life easier on the net.  There are
no rules, in the sense that rules can be enforced.  Anyone with a feed
can do damn near anything they think they can get away with.  The typical
method of "enforcement" is roughly:

	posted flames
	complaints to the poster
	"mail bombs" to the poster
	complaints to the poster's sysadmin
	complaints to the poster's site's feed site

Mail doesn't seem to get to the poster in these cases.

Mail to the sysadmin doesn't seem to be doing much good either.

MN.ORG should have a case for disconnecting anatolia's feed, since 
the MN.ORG computer has been crashed as a result of actions
initiated by anatolia's users.  Disruption of service should
always be good for a disconnect.  note: the crash was due to
overload from mail-bombs heading *for* anatolia, but clearly
in response *to* the mass of postings coming from anatolia.

However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG
cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection...

UUnet may have a harder time justifying it, unless there is a
clause in the feed contract stating that they expect their 
clients to follow the guidelines of the Usenet.  If there is
such a clause, maybe UUnet can use it as justification for
cutting off the connection.

Any comments from someone with UUnet?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lazy day, Sunday afternoon.			|
Like to get your feet up, watch TV.		|	-Richard Hartman	
Sunday roast is something good to eat,		|	hartman@uLogic.COM
must be lamb to day 'cause beef was last week!	|
Re: etiquette
#227
Author: Charles R. Dennett
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:00
26 lines
1704 bytes
In article <797@ulogic.UUCP> hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) writes:
>
>MN.ORG should have a case for disconnecting anatolia's feed, since 
>the MN.ORG computer has been crashed as a result of actions
>initiated by anatolia's users.  Disruption of service should
>always be good for a disconnect.  note: the crash was due to
>overload from mail-bombs heading *for* anatolia, but clearly
>in response *to* the mass of postings coming from anatolia.
>
>However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG
>cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection...
>
>UUnet may have a harder time justifying it, unless there is a
>clause in the feed contract stating that they expect their 
>clients to follow the guidelines of the Usenet.  If there is
>such a clause, maybe UUnet can use it as justification for
>cutting off the connection.
>

Well, maybe something has happened.  It's been two days and nothing
from our friend, at least in n.a.p.  Shucks, and just when
I was going to tell you all about my fantastic turkey dinner we
had here in Greece, NY (yup, that the name of the town where
I live.)  :-)

Charlie Dennett --  dennett@kodak.com
Re: etiquette
#228
Author: Sridhar Venkataraman
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:08
17 lines
1135 bytes
hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) writes:

I am not sure whether it is true that zuma is somewhere in the Eastern
timezone and anatolia is in the Central timezone. Atleast that is what
the Date header reflects but then it can be forged.

)However, from a previous posting I gather that even if MN.ORG
)cut anatolia off, there is still a UUnet connection...

Anatolia now gets email for "free" (right?) aside from the domain
registration charge. If it has to download email from UUnet it is a toll
call. It would be interesting to know what develops if MN.ORG cuts off
anatolia. 

Sridhar.
--
Sridhar Venkataraman			sridhar@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads