Article View: news.admin.technical
Article #20Re: NFS vs NNTP for news reading
From: Mike Meyer
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 21:04
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 21:04
9 lines
1015 bytes
1015 bytes
In <56289@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>, jerry@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Jerry Aguirre) wrote: > So, what you are saying is that it is more important to get new news, I'd say that's a definite yes. If you think your users get upset when their newsreaders take a fraction of a second longer to respond, wait until they stop getting news in a timely fashion because your way behind in dealing with in.coming. <mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mwm.227h@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!scottReferences:
<TROST.92Sep23212955@romulus.reed.edu> <Bv3qL8.AvE@cs.bham.ac.uk> <bolo.717434610@cs.wisc.edu> <56289@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!scott From: mwm@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us (Mike Meyer) Newsgroups: news.admin.technical Subject: Re: NFS vs NNTP for news reading Message-ID: <mwm.227h@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: 26 Sep 92 21:04:16 GMT References: <TROST.92Sep23212955@romulus.reed.edu> <Bv3qL8.AvE@cs.bham.ac.uk> <bolo.717434610@cs.wisc.edu> <56289@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 9 Approved: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG