Article View: news.admin.technical
Article #61Re: To compress or not to compress?
From: Tom Limoncelli
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:36
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:36
32 lines
1696 bytes
1696 bytes
In <1jvjuvINN8l6@ftp.UU.NET> news@gvc.com (News Administrator) writes: > [ modem compression on or off for news? ] >I'm most interested in hard data on PEP, TurboPEP and V32bis/V42bis. I run a Sun3 news system at home. Here's what I discovered: Compressing a compressed file results in a 50% slow-down. Why? Because compression is not magic, it is the removal of entropy and once you remove all of the entropy you can't remove any more. [ How's that for over-simplying a very difficult mathematical concept? ] (BTW, I knew that was going to be the result but I was trying to figure out if PEP would automatically shut off compression if the compression ratio was really bad. It doesn't. Maybe TurboPEP does? ] So, who should lead us to the question, "So, should my Sun3 do the compression or should I leave it up to my modem?" I expected it to be better to off-load the dirty work to the modem, since my Sun3 is so slow. However, I found that the 2x bytes going through the serial port slowed things down worse than running "compress" on the Sun3. That's my view. Your mileage may vary. Tom -- Tom Limoncelli -- tal@warren.mentorg.com (work) -- tal@plts.uucp (play) Unix is a trademark of, WHATT????
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k18fcINN274@ftp.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mailReferences:
<1jvjuvINN8l6@ftp.UU.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail From: tom_limoncelli@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Tom Limoncelli) Newsgroups: news.admin.technical Subject: Re: To compress or not to compress? Date: 25 Jan 1993 12:36:44 -0500 Organization: Mentor Graphics -- IC Group Lines: 33 Sender: zorch@ftp.UU.NET Approved: zorch@uunet.UU.NET Distribution: world Message-ID: <1k18fcINN274@ftp.UU.NET> References: <1jvjuvINN8l6@ftp.UU.NET> NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.uu.net