🚀 go-pugleaf

mcb@ncis.tis.llnl.gov (Michael C. Berch) writes:
>
>I have been posting skeptical articles in talk.religion.newage off and
>on since its inception, and believe it is a perfectly acceptable forum 
>for skepticism.  I have gotten some occasional nasty mail, but not
>very much, but I have also gotten some New Age adherents to respond
>articulately on occasion as well.
>
>Why is a new group needed?
>

I think that many who might otherwise be exceptional contributors to
such a groups as I propose would shy away from wading through the
flotsam of talk.religion.newage.  

This group would obviously have many cross-postings and as such be a
kind of filter for others.

I have had some nasty mail too, and perhaps this will allow for more
eloquent discussion.

nrg

-- 
York University          |"_Wanting_ to think is one thing;
Department of Philosophy |      having a talent for thinking another"
Toronto, Ontario, Canada |                          - L. Wittgenstein (CV 44)
_____________________________________________________________________________