Article View: news.admin
Article #162Re: comp.lang.rexx and inet and comp.?.andrew
From: David Wright
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 1989 09:12
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 1989 09:12
19 lines
1529 bytes
1529 bytes
In article <4354@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
#In article <6799@pyrnj.uucp>, romain@pyrnj.uucp (Romain Kang) writes:
#> Or is it time to ...make the fifty-odd inet groups regular Usenet groups?
#
#Do something about comp.soft-sys, first. There's nothing wrong with the
#name comp.sys.andrew.
You and I agree completely on this, but it appears that now the name
comp.soft-sys.andrew exists as a 'real' group, the vast majority of the
net doesn't care a **** about our view that the name should have been
comp.sys.andrew, and the only person who does care disagrees with us.
Having counted the number of X's in comp.X.*, I suspect that it is now
too late to bring order into them. As for the inet groups - let them
all come. I don't even know which are inet and which are Usenet any more.
Regards, "None shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity"
David Wright STL, London Road, Harlow, Essex CM17 9NA, UK
dww@stl.stc.co.uk <or> ...uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww <or> PSI%234237100122::DWW
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1527@stl.stc.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!dwwReferences:
<6799@pyrnj.uucp> <4354@ficc.uu.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww From: dww@stl.stc.co.uk (David Wright) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: comp.lang.rexx and inet and comp.?.andrew Keywords: inet leak Message-ID: <1527@stl.stc.co.uk> Date: 18 Jun 89 09:12:23 GMT References: <6799@pyrnj.uucp> <4354@ficc.uu.net> Sender: news@stl.stc.co.uk Reply-To: "David Wright" <dww@stl.stc.co.uk> Organization: STC Technology Limited, London Road, Harlow, Essex, UK Lines: 19