🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <96@coms.fr> philip@axis.fr (Philip Peake) writes:
>In article <29860@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, wisner@mica.Berkeley.EDU (Bill Wisner) writes:
>> >WERE doing - see the latest issue of the EUUG Newsletter, EUnet column
>> >for the latest information on this 'competition'.

->After that they tried (are trying) to re-establish friendly relations
->with us: we of course feel the need of granting to *amateurs* a *limited*
->access to the network, but we don't think that those hackers of Sublink
->have the necessary accomplishments of capability and honesty to run the
->*amateur* part on our behalf.


It would seem from the 'extract' (mostly deleted) that what you guys over 
there really need is an anti-EUUG user group. Something to let the amateurs 
show you how to really get everyone involved in networking and cost sharing.

Further you could use a little less order and a lot more anarchy to wake 
everybody up. Even state monopolies need a kick in the butt every once in a 
while. Start a ruckus! Call your local politico. Write letters to your editor.
Do whatever one does when laws need changing for the benefit of all. Damn-it!
Act like a Democracy.

Unless you get the masses to rise you'll always have the bureaucrats stifle 
progress with the onus of what your newsletter talks about: to keep THEM out 
and US in.

Fred Rump

-- 
This is my house.   My castle will get started right after I finish with news. 
26 Warren St.             uucp:          ...{bpa dsinc uunet}!cdin-1!icdi10!fr
Beverly, NJ 08010       domain:  fred@cdin-1.uu.net or icdi10!fr@cdin-1.uu.net
609-386-6846          "Freude... Alle Menschen werden Brueder..."  -  Schiller