Article View: news.admin
Article #3153Re: who pays for USENET
From: Bud Hovell
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:59
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:59
75 lines
4585 bytes
4585 bytes
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes: >However, money that a corporation spends on restrooms, or replacements >for equipment broken by employees, or the cafeteria, or in fact >anything except the employee's own salary, is money that the >organization cannot use to pay employees. [balance deleted] Excuse me, Marc, but you seem to be operating under some new-age illusion that suggests employees have an inherent primacy in the food-chain of organizational funding. While people may be the most valuable asset of an organization, they have no ultimate claim on whatever expenditure may be disposed to other requirements. And people don't even become a justifiable expense until there is something to *do* which is valued by someone willing to pay for it -- specifically, a *customer*. Paying the printer to produce marketing literature may become a much higher priority than hiring another person to write code. Or carry out the trash. Or prepare the tax statement. Or teach a class which no one signs up for. Or carry out obscure research which no-one but the researcher frankly cares about *at all*. Customers are the first agenda to be met. Not paying more employees -- or paying more to the existing ones simply because they are extraordinarily nice folks. This applies equally to profit-making and non-profit-making "businesses" (which are different only in the arbitrary rules of taxation on their revenue sources and specific missions). In either case, however, employees "pay" for nothing. They are paid. Along with the government, the rent, the telephone and electricity, the suppliers, etc. Please note that "etc." is a much larger obligation than would be guessed by typical employees -- who remain blissfully clueless about what's implied in operating a real business, and would be astonished by that grim reality. (Please refer to the June Wall Street Journal article by the esteemed [former-liberal] George McGovern so as to get a flavor of what happens when one of the truly insulated encounters the real world created largely by a Congress which casually passes expropriatory laws upon the heads of its citizens -- then routinely excludes itself from compliance to the same nonsense, while simul- taneously creating special benefits for its own members which would have been the envy of Karl Marx, and outright bribing a knowing populace to keep them in office by ever-escalating "entitlements" which seven future generations of Americans will never *ever* be able to pay off except through a depressionary cycle of extreme inflation or -- less likely -- extreme deflation. All after they, themselves, are safely tucked away in their cynical little graves, of course.) People on payroll may have a rightful entitlement to be paid *first*. (Well, right after helpful, friendly government, of course). But they have *no* entitlement to be paid *all*. Unless, of course, they wish to collectively buy and manage the enterprise. (Which is just a *fine* idea, in my book. :-) To obtain the right to all residual revenues after *everone* and *everything* else is paid, one must decide to become the source of finding customers to feed an enterprise. And administer it. And manage it. And not be concerned about how many hours a week one may put in, or what duties may fall to him to perform -- including sweeping the floors and cleaning out the urinals, if need be. All in the hope that the day will come where the investment will allow him the *earned* entitlement to a profit exceeding what he might receive as an employee. Which profit will never come for many of these folks -- so and they will again become employees. No dishonor in that. At least they've tried. But they also typically return to the ranks of hired labor with a *profoundly* different attitude than the one you exhibited here, and which clearly has not been subjected to a reality check. -- ________________________________________________________________ bud@mtek.com ... uunet!m2xenix!mtek!bud ... bud@rigel.cs.pdx.edu MTEK International, Inc. Throughput Technology Corp. Throughput!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep26.175907.3013@mtek.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!m2xenix!mtek!budReferences:
<1992Sep24.180412.8565@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com> <Bv3sLF.My7@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: news.admin Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!m2xenix!mtek!bud From: bud@mtek.com (Bud Hovell) Subject: Re: who pays for USENET Reply-To: bud@mtek.com Organization: MTEK International, Inc. Distribution: na Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 17:59:07 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep26.175907.3013@mtek.com> References: <1992Sep24.180412.8565@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com> <Bv3sLF.My7@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> Lines: 75